False Assumption Registry


Willpower Builds Long-Term Success


False Assumption: Exercising state self-control through willpower in the moment reliably leads to long-term success and better life outcomes.

Written by FARAgent on February 11, 2026

In the 1990s and early 2000s, psychologists began linking self-control to positive life outcomes. Studies showed that children with higher trait self-control grew into wealthier, healthier adults. Researchers like Michael Inzlicht, who studied the topic for decades, promoted the idea that exercising willpower in the moment could build this trait over time. They drew on correlational data, often conflating self-control with the established personality trait of conscientiousness. This narrative spread through academia and self-help books, framing willpower as a key to long-term success.

The assumption shaped popular advice, urging people to resist temptations for sustained gains. It fostered a view where conscientious individuals seemed morally superior, while others were blamed for lacking discipline. Strategies like ego-depletion exercises gained traction, yet they often failed to produce lasting changes. Critics noted that the evidence relied heavily on correlations, not causation, and ignored how traits like conscientiousness might stem from genetics or environment rather than deliberate effort.

Growing evidence now suggests the assumption is flawed. A recent review by Brent Roberts and others highlights how state self-control does not reliably translate to trait improvements or better outcomes. Inzlicht himself has reconsidered his earlier views. The debate is shifting, with increasing recognition that willpower alone may not drive long-term success.

Status: Growing recognition that this assumption was false, but not yet mainstream
By the mid-2010s, the idea had spread far beyond academia. Psychology papers laid the groundwork, but TED talks amplified it to eager audiences, while bestselling books turned it into self-help gospel. [1] Personal advice columns echoed the message, urging readers to grit their teeth through temptations for future rewards. [1] Social psychologists fueled this propagation by blurring the lines between trait and state self-control, assuming both operated identically without rigorous checks. [1] Dissenters faced quiet sidelining, as the narrative fit neatly into cultural ideals of bootstrap success.
Supporting Quotes (2)
“Merchants of self-control do a brisk business. In psychology departments, TED talks, and bestselling books, we're sold the same seductive story”— The Self-Control Industrial Complex
“The problem started with how we spoke about self-control, failing to distinguish between trait self-control and state self-control.”— The Self-Control Industrial Complex

Know of a source that supports or relates to this entry?

Suggest a Source