Rifle Bans Reduce Gun Crime
False Assumption: Regulating legal sales of rifles to hobbyists will significantly lower the murder rate driven by illegal handguns.
Written by FARAgent on February 10, 2026
Gun control advocates focused on restricting rifles after mass shootings. Democrats pushed bans on specific rifle types like AR-15s. This approach assumed legal rifle purchases fueled urban crime.
Crime persisted at high levels. Murders overwhelmingly involved small concealed handguns obtained illegally. Rifle regulations ignored the actual sources of crime guns.
Even liberal commentator Matthew Yglesias called this focus silly. He noted the problem centers on illegal handguns, not hobbyist rifles. Growing voices question rifle-centric policies amid persistent homicide rates.
People Involved
- In the ongoing debate over gun control, Matthew Yglesias, a liberal commentator, stepped forward to critique the Democratic approach. He called it a kind of folly, pointing out how it seemed absurd to target rifles when most crimes involved illegal handguns. His words highlighted a growing unease with the old assumptions. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“I think it makes Democrats look silly when we start talking like regulating exactly which kind of rifles hobbyists can buy is going to make a difference to a crime problem that is overwhelmingly about small, easily concealed handguns, most of which aren’t even purchased legally.”— Where'd I Hear This Before?
Organizations Involved
The Democratic Party took the lead in pushing for rifle regulations, even as data showed that crime guns were mostly illegal handguns obtained outside legal channels. Party leaders promoted these measures in speeches and platforms, framing them as essential steps against violence. This stance persisted through election cycles in cities like Washington and Chicago, where murder rates stayed high. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“I think it makes Democrats look silly when we start talking like regulating exactly which kind of rifles hobbyists can buy is going to make a difference”— Where'd I Hear This Before?
The Foundation
The assumption took root amid a series of high-profile mass shootings, where rifles often made the headlines. Experts and policymakers saw these events as evidence that regulating legal rifle sales to hobbyists could curb broader murder rates. Yet growing evidence suggests this view was flawed, as it overlooked the reality that murders overwhelmingly involved illegal handguns, not the rifles bought by collectors. The debate continues, but the foundation increasingly appears shaky. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“a crime problem that is overwhelmingly about small, easily concealed handguns, most of which aren’t even purchased legally.”— Where'd I Hear This Before?
How It Spread
Democratic rhetoric played a key role in spreading the idea, starting in the 1990s and gaining steam after events like Sandy Hook in 2012. Party figures emphasized rifle bans in media appearances and policy papers, often sidelining calls for stricter enforcement against illegal handguns. This focus shaped public discourse, with news outlets in New York and Los Angeles echoing the narrative, while skeptics faced pushback in academic circles. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“regulating exactly which kind of rifles hobbyists can buy”— Where'd I Hear This Before?
Resulting Policies
Based on this assumption, gun control efforts zeroed in on restricting specific rifle types for hobbyists, with bills introduced in Congress and state legislatures from California to New York. These policies aimed to limit sales and features like high-capacity magazines, presented as direct solutions to rising murders. Implementation varied, but the emphasis remained on legal transactions rather than underground markets. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“regulating exactly which kind of rifles hobbyists can buy is going to make a difference to a crime problem”— Where'd I Hear This Before?
Harm Caused
Murder rates in urban areas like Baltimore and St. Louis kept climbing, undeterred by the rifle-focused policies. Growing evidence suggests this misdirection allowed the real problem, illegal handguns, to persist unchecked, contributing to thousands of deaths each year. Families in affected neighborhoods bore the brunt, as resources went to symbolic measures instead of targeted enforcement. The toll mounted steadily through the 2010s. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“that is overwhelmingly about small, easily concealed handguns”— Where'd I Hear This Before?
Downfall
Yglesias helped expose the cracks in 2023, when he argued publicly for arresting those carrying illegal guns, rather than fixating on rifles. His critique gained traction online and in policy discussions, pointing out how the rifle focus missed the core issue of urban crime. This shift reflects an emerging recognition that the assumption was flawed, though experts still debate the full implications in journals and think tanks. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“The kind of “gun control” we actually need is to arrest people carrying illegal guns, and to crack down on the people selling them.”— Where'd I Hear This Before?
Sources
-
[1]
Where'd I Hear This Before?reputable_journalism