False Assumption Registry


Primitive Communism Reveals Species Being


False Assumption: Foraging societies practiced a primitive communism representing humanity's natural species being, which modern communism scales up to eliminate oppression and achieve utopia.

Written by FARAgent on February 09, 2026

In the 19th century, Karl Marx spun a grand theory of history, positing that humanity began in primitive communism among foraging bands, limited only by scant productive forces; history's arc would bend toward a global communism once technology liberated the proletariat from class oppression. This vision, with its nod to our deep evolutionary past, seduced intellectuals and revolutionaries who saw in it a return to authentic human communality, untainted by capitalist alienation.

Communist regimes from Soviet Russia to Maoist China duly scaled up the model, enforcing 'from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs' at industrial scale. The results rhymed with the foraging past Marx romanticized: internal purges and violence to curb free riders, external aggressions, genocidal campaigns, terror-famines, mass murders, economic stagnation, and waves of refugees. What worked in loving families or tiny bands, bound by intimate biology and information webs, metastasized into horror when imposed on millions.

Today, the illusion stands exposed; foraging societies, far from idylls, boasted the highest homicide rates of any humans, routine genocides, and technological stasis for millennia. Modern consensus recoils from Marx's scaling fantasy, recognizing it as atavistic folly dressed in utopian drag, a dark comedy where experts yearned to outdo evolution by recreating its cruelties at planetary pitch.

Status: Mainstream now strongly agrees this assumption was false
  • Karl Marx laid out the theory in the 19th century. He described history as moving from primitive communism in foraging societies to a global version. Advanced production would end classes and oppression, he argued.
  • Marx believed this in good faith. He saw it as the path to human essence. [1]
Supporting Quotes (1)
“Indeed, in the theory of Karl Marx, the march of history is from primitive communism—which suffered from tribal narrowness due to under-developed productive capacity—to global communism.”— Communism has deep human appeal
Communist movements took up the idea in the early 20th century. They promoted scaling primitive communism to entire nations. Regimes enforced it through state power. They ignored the violence in foraging life for the sake of ideology. These organizations profited from the appeal, building tyrannies on the model. [1]
Supporting Quotes (1)
“Marx was right, modern communism is a scaling up of primitive communism. Problem is, this is not a good thing.”— Communism has deep human appeal
Marx's idea drew from beliefs about early human societies. Foraging groups seemed to show humanity's natural state, a baseline of sharing. This view held until evidence proved it wrong. Those societies were violent inside and out, prone to genocide and stuck in technological ruts. [1] The slogan 'from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs' worked in small families. Experts thought it could scale up. They were mistaken. It failed beyond close kin, like cells turning cancerous. [1] Bands of about 150 people got cited as models. They evolved over millennia, the thinking went. But they did not scale. Homicide rates ran high in them. [1]
Supporting Quotes (3)
“So, violent, genocidal, a strong tendency towards technological stagnation. Does this sound familiar? Marx was right, modern communism is a scaling up of primitive communism.”— Communism has deep human appeal
“Many loving and effective families do operate on the principle of from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs. Problem is, cancer cells also operate on that principle.”— Communism has deep human appeal
“Webs of intimate connections and information scale up to the foraging band—typically around 150 souls, the famous Dunbar’s Number—that was the basis of Homo sapien subsistence for the overwhelming majority of our existence as a species.”— Communism has deep human appeal
The theory spread through universities and books in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Intellectuals romanticized foraging life as ideal, against historical facts. [1] It gained ground with the promise that 'this time will be different.' Failures piled up, but the wish persisted. People untouched by communism's realities bought in. [1]
Supporting Quotes (2)
“whose primitive communism Marx cites as revealing our “species being””— Communism has deep human appeal
“Yes, some of this is the wish-fulfilment power of this time will be different. It never is different in ways that are a net positive to human flourishing, but that has remarkably little purchase.”— Communism has deep human appeal
Regimes in places like Russia and China applied the principles starting in the 1910s and 1940s. They forced collectivism on farms and factories. Violence kept it in place. Oppression followed, not freedom. The scaling led straight to tyranny. [1]
Supporting Quotes (1)
“the latter would be achieved when our productive capacity had multiplied so hugely as to enable elimination of all other classes apart from the one that does the productive work (the proletariat) coupled with liberation from the oppression”— Communism has deep human appeal
These systems brought terror-famines and mass killings. Economies stalled. Millions fled as refugees. The harm echoed the stagnation and violence of foraging bands. [1] Those early societies had the worst homicide rates known. They killed to stop free riders inside and wiped out rivals outside. Technology stood still for over 200,000 years. [1]
Supporting Quotes (2)
“Despite the terror-famines, the mass murders, the tyrannies, the economic stagnation, the millions of refugees, some version of the communist ideal”— Communism has deep human appeal
“horticultural and foraging cultures have the highest rates of homicide of any human societies. [...] foraging populations genociding each other was a recurrent occurrence. [...] remarkably little technological development for over 200,000 years”— Communism has deep human appeal

Know of a source that supports or relates to this entry?

Suggest a Source