Poverty Prevents Human Flourishing
False Assumption: Poor countries produce unhappy populations because poverty precludes individual and societal flourishing.
Written by FARAgent on February 11, 2026
In 2025, the World Happiness Report ranked Finland happiest using a life evaluation ladder metric that correlates with GDP, reinforcing elite beliefs that wealth drives happiness. Nordic countries topped lists annually since 2012, while poor nations like Afghanistan ranked low. This supported global policies pushing poor countries to emulate rich ones like Denmark.
The report's single-question method fixated respondents on wealth and status, stacking results toward economic prosperity. Thinkers like Fukuyama and Pinker urged turbulent nations to 'get to Denmark.' The IMF promoted trade and growth on happiness-through-wealth theory.
A new Global Flourishing Report by Johnson, VanderWeele, and Case measured broader well-being across finances, relationships, health, purpose, and security in 22 countries. Indonesia topped the list, ahead of the US, UK, and Nordics. White countries clustered low, with Japan last. Critics question if such rankings reflect real flourishing or survey noise, but they challenge immigration rationales assuming Third Worlders must flee unhappy homelands.
People Involved
- In the realm of political thought, Francis Fukuyama and Steven Pinker pushed the notion that poor nations ought to mimic Denmark to achieve happiness. They positioned wealth as the key to flourishing, guiding discussions on global development. [1]
- Meanwhile, social scientists Byron Johnson, Tyler J.
- VanderWeele, and Brendan Case took a different tack. Directing a global well-being project, they questioned the narrow focus on happiness metrics. Critics argue their work, which ranked poor Indonesia at the top in broader flourishing measures, began to chip away at the wealth-happiness link. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“Political thinkers such as Francis Fukuyama and Steven Pinker talk about wanting to help poor and turbulent nations “get to Denmark.””— Are Indonesians the world's most flourishing people?
“The three of us conceive of happiness — or flourishing — more broadly: as a state of affairs in which all aspects of your life are relatively good, including the social environments in which you live.”— Are Indonesians the world's most flourishing people?
Organizations Involved
The World Happiness Report consortium, which includes Gallup, started issuing annual rankings in 2012. These rankings relied on life evaluations that tied closely to GDP, boosting the idea that rich, stable democracies like the Nordic countries led in happiness. [1] The International Monetary Fund followed suit, pushing trade and economic growth policies rooted in the belief that material prosperity drove well-being, as drawn from those same rankings. [1] Mounting evidence challenges whether such institutional incentives truly captured human flourishing, yet the organizations pressed on with their models.
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“The report, released annually since 2012 by a consortium of groups including Gallup, often features these four Nordic nations — all of them stable democracies with prosperous and healthy citizens — at or near the top of its list.”— Are Indonesians the world's most flourishing people?
“The International Monetary Fund encourages trade and economic growth on the theory that happiness increases with material prosperity.”— Are Indonesians the world's most flourishing people?
The Foundation
The World Happiness Report built its case on a life evaluation metric, where people rated their lives on an 11-rung ladder from best to worst possible. This approach appeared straightforward, acting as a proxy for prosperity. [1] It fostered the sub-belief that wealth was essential for flourishing, supporting development models even as signs of contentment emerged in poorer places like Indonesia. [1] Growing questions surround this foundation, with critics arguing it overlooked relationships, purpose, and health in favor of a wealth fixation.
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“Respondents are asked a single question: to imagine an 11-rung ladder whose top and bottom are the best and worst possible lives, and to place their life on one of the rungs.”— Are Indonesians the world's most flourishing people?
“These rankings reinforce a key supposition of our globalized political and economic order: Poor countries are unhappy because they are poor, and wealth is a critical precondition for individual and societal flourishing.”— Are Indonesians the world's most flourishing people?
How It Spread
The idea gained traction through global channels. The globalized political and economic order leaned on happiness rankings to back international development strategies, assuming prosperity equaled well-being. [1] Then, in a shift, the New York Times opinion page ran a piece critiquing the World Happiness Report. It highlighted broader flourishing measures that flipped the wealth-happiness story, planting seeds of doubt in public discourse. [1] Experts remain split on how deeply this challenged the orthodoxy.
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“From the New York Times opinion page: The Happiest Country in the World Isn’t What You Think”— Are Indonesians the world's most flourishing people?
“These rankings reinforce a key supposition of our globalized political and economic order”— Are Indonesians the world's most flourishing people?
Resulting Policies
Policies took shape around the happiness-through-prosperity theory. The International Monetary Fund rolled out trade and growth initiatives, drawing directly from the World Happiness Report's rankings. [1] These efforts aimed to lift poor nations by emulating wealthier models, though critics argue they may have missed local paths to flourishing. The debate continues over whether such policies addressed the full picture of human well-being.
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“The International Monetary Fund encourages trade and economic growth on the theory that happiness increases with material prosperity.”— Are Indonesians the world's most flourishing people?
Harm Caused
An undercurrent ran through liberal circles, the unspoken view that nonwhite populations could not build decent societies on their own. This fueled mass immigration to white nations, adding pressures that might have been avoidable if flourishing at home was recognized. [1] Growing dissenters point to potential harms from these migration flows, suggesting they stemmed from a flawed assumption about poverty and unhappiness. The full consequences remain a matter of contention.
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“The common liberal unspoken assumption is that of course nonwhites can’t organize their own decent countries, so they morally must be allowed to immigrate en masse to white countries.”— Are Indonesians the world's most flourishing people?
Downfall
The turning point came with the 2025 Global Flourishing Report. It assessed well-being across 22 countries using broad metrics and placed Indonesia at the top. [1] This ranking put poor nations ahead of rich ones like the United States and the Nordics, highlighting flaws in GDP-linked life evaluations. [1] Mounting evidence challenges the old assumption, though the debate persists among experts on whether this fully upends the wealth-flourishing connection.
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“So here’s their new Global Flourishing Report, which so far focuses on 22 countries from here and there around the world. Counting financial indicators, the most flourishing population on Earth is said to be … Indonesia’s.”— Are Indonesians the world's most flourishing people?
Sources
-
[1]
Are Indonesians the world's most flourishing people?reputable_journalism