Most Oppressed Are Most Talented
False Assumption: The most oppressed groups, especially black women due to intersecting racism and sexism, possess the most underexploited talent and merit promotion to leadership roles.
Written by FARAgent on February 10, 2026
Eugyppius earned tenure at a wealthy American college in the early 2010s. After 2015, the Great Awokening brought intense administrative pressure and a powerful departmental minority bloc. Hiring white men became nearly impossible. Interviewing them risked racism accusations from diversity enforcers.
Intersectionality theory exalted black women as victims of both racism and sexism. This made them the most oppressed, so they must hold the most untapped talent relative to their positions. Institutions followed this logic. They promoted black women to top jobs like college presidents, CEOs, and editors-in-chief during 2020-2022.
Many promoted black women underperformed. Firings followed in 2023-2025, including Claudine Gay at Harvard. Critics like Eugyppius and Jacob Savage now discuss the DEI era openly. Their accounts help shift it toward consensus reality as recognizable lunacy.
Status: Growing recognition that this assumption was false, but not yet mainstream
People Involved
- Eugyppius, a tenured professor and white man, endured near-daily racial harassment from diversity enforcers and angry black women at his American college. He quit soon after and returned to Germany, where he warned of the DEI madness like a modern Cassandra. [1]
- Jacob Savage, an opinion journalist, wrote 'Lost Generation' to critique the post-2015 DEI hiring purge of white men. His fresh voice helped expose the era as a scam. [1]
- Claudine Gay rose to Harvard president under intersectionality logic. She exemplified appointees who underperformed and got fired. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (3)
“After I was nearly cancelled a few times, I decided that near-daily racial harassment wasn’t worth the salary. I abandoned my job and moved back to Germany, just a few years into the glorious American cultural revolution. I wasn’t getting paid nearly enough to recentre my professional life around the tiresome intellectual pretensions and imaginary racial grievances of undertalented, overpromoted angry black women.”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
“Savage’s service is subtler, in that he’s helped move the DEI craziness that took off after 2015 into the sphere of consensus reality.”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
“promoted black women to their top jobs (e.g., Claudine Gay at Harvard and Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee).”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
Organizations Involved
A wealthy American college, unnamed by
Eugyppius, enforced DEI policies after 2015. It pressured departments to avoid white male hires, under threat of racism accusations.
[1] Harvard promoted
Claudine Gay to president based on intersectionality. The university fired her amid scandals.
[1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“after 2015, intense pressure from the administration and an increasingly powerful minority bloc within my own department made it all but impossible to hire white men, whatever the situation.”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
“a number of prominent institutions, especially in the media, publishing, academia etc, during the Racial Reckoning took this logic seriously and promoted black women to their top jobs (e.g., Claudine Gay at Harvard”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
The Foundation
Intersectionality held that black women faced both racism and sexism, marking them as most oppressed. This led to the view that they held the most underexploited talent for leadership roles. The idea seemed credible through hierarchies of oppression. Yet it overlooked competence evidence from fifty years of affirmative action.
[1] The promotion logic resembled an underwear gnomes plan: promote black women, watch them excel, then profit. It fostered a sub-belief in vast overlooked talent, despite patterns of underperformance.
[1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“One trend that was exceptionally obvious during the Great Awokening was the exaltation of black women due to the Theory of Intersectionality. Black women, you see, were victims not just of racism (like black men are) or sexism (like white women are) but of both racism and sexism. And since they were the most oppressed, they had to be the best relative to their current jobs.”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
“The thinking was like the Underwear Gnomes’ business plan, just even more streamlined: Step 1: Promote black women. Step 2: Black women do amazingly great on the job. Step 3: Profit!”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
How It Spread
After 2015, administrative pressure and diversity enforcers spread DEI ideas. They used veiled racism accusations to block white male hiring.
[1] Media coverage amplified intersectionality promotions during the 2020-2022 Racial Reckoning. Stories of rising black women leaders filled the news.
[1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“In some cases merely interviewing a white guy was enough to risk veiled accusations of racism from the diversity enforcers.”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
“It was in all the papers at the time.”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
Resulting Policies
American colleges adopted DEI hiring policies after 2015. These banned effective recruitment of white men. Administration and departmental blocs enforced them.
[1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“intense pressure from the administration and an increasingly powerful minority bloc within my own department made it all but impossible to hire white men”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
Harm Caused
Faculty like
Eugyppius quit amid harassment. White men among his grad acquaintances found no tenure-track jobs. Institutions installed incompetent leaders.
[1] Promoted black women in top roles caused institutional damage. Many faced firings from 2023 to 2025.
[1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“Of all the white men among my graduate school acquaintances, I’m the only one I know of who got a tenure-track job at all.”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
“a lot of the black women crowned as CEOs, Editors-in-Chief, college presidents, and the like in 2020-2022 started getting fired in 2023-2025.”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
Downfall
Growing evidence suggests the assumption was flawed. Firings of promoted black women, like
Claudine Gay, exposed incompetence from 2023 to 2025.
[1] Jacob Savage's article shifted DEI critiques toward consensus.
Eugyppius's insider account gained traction. Together, they made post-2015 DEI openly criticizable, though the debate remains unsettled.
[1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“And, indeed, a lot of the black women crowned as CEOs, Editors-in-Chief, college presidents, and the like in 2020-2022 started getting fired in 2023-2025.”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast
“Since his piece came out, those years of lunacy have become something that people can discuss, criticise and perhaps even repudiate, confident in the knowledge that what happened back then (and, to varying degrees, is still happening now) is on a shared cultural map.”— A View From Inside the Belly of the Beast