Mass Immigration Secures Liberal Votes
False Assumption: High levels of immigration after 2020 would provide reliable electoral support for liberal parties because immigrants are inherently good people aligned against conservatives.
Written by FARAgent on February 10, 2026
After COVID, Trump, and George Floyd, Anglosphere governments ramped up immigration. Anti-racism became the top priority. Restricting immigrants seemed racist, like Trump. Biden eased border enforcement expecting little trouble.
Liberals viewed immigration as a global right, not America's choice. They rejected selecting better immigrants, calling such ideas shocking. Immigrants good, opponents bad. This mindset drove policy without deep thought.
In 2024, Trump won partly because immigrants and nonwhites shifted toward him. Democrats reeled from the shock. Their simple good-vs-bad model collapsed when supposed good people backed the ultimate bad person.
People Involved
- In the years following 2020, the Biden Administration eased border enforcement, convinced that strict controls smacked of racism and echoed Trump's policies. They were caught off guard by the resulting surge of migrants. [1]
- Meanwhile, Donald Trump had long warned that not all immigrants were equal in quality, a notion that horrified liberals who dismissed any selection based on merit. [1]
- Decades earlier, Ted Kennedy had championed the 1965 immigration act and the 1990 diversity visa lottery, figuring it would bring more Irish voters to bolster his family's political fortunes, without much further thought. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (3)
“the Biden Administration didn't seem to have a well-worked out rationalization for letting in so many immigrants. Instead, they just seemed to feel that it was racist and Trump-like to try hard to keep immigrants out. And then they got surprised when they eased off border enforcement at how many migrants swarmed in”— Why Did the Anglosphere Go Hog Wild Over Immigration?
“two things that Trump said that liberals found perhaps most shocking both involved Trump’s assumption that some immigrants are better than other immigrants: Mexico is not sending their best, and, judging from Norway and Haiti, Norwegians would make better immigrants than Haitians.”— Why Did the Anglosphere Go Hog Wild Over Immigration?
“Ted Kennedy sponsored both the 1965 immigration act and the 1990 diversity visa lottery. Did Teddy’s braintrust carefully calculate how to maximize the Great Replacement? Nah. As far as I can tell, in both cases, Senator Ted drunkenly reasoned, Mayor Quimby-like, that his bills would bring in more Irishmen to vote for Kennedys.”— Why Did the Anglosphere Go Hog Wild Over Immigration?
Organizations Involved
Governments across the Anglosphere, including those in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, pushed for high levels of immigration after 2020. They offered little rationale beyond a commitment to anti-racism. [1] These institutions sustained the push through policies that prioritized openness, often without weighing the electoral or social outcomes. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“Why did major Anglosphere governments such as the U.S., U.K., Canada, and Australia go hog wild on immigration after 2020?”— Why Did the Anglosphere Go Hog Wild Over Immigration?
The Foundation
The assumption took root amid the anti-racism fervor that followed George Floyd's death in 2020. Experts and officials held that maintaining white-majority populations was inherently racist, which fostered the sub-belief that all immigration was a moral good. [1] Liberals increasingly viewed immigration as a basic civil right for people worldwide, not something subject to national discretion. This perspective drew from progressive moralism but overlooked questions of sovereignty. [1] Growing evidence now suggests this foundation was flawed, though the debate continues. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“After Covid, English-speaking nations tended to go nuts over immigrants. ... keep in mind that the After Covid years were also the After Trump and After George Floyd years. Anti-Racism became the highest priority, and what is more racist than white people trying to keep their country white?”— Why Did the Anglosphere Go Hog Wild Over Immigration?
“American progressives don’t see who gets to immigrate to America as really being any of the business of Americans like themselves. Instead, it’s the fundamental civil right of all inhabitants of the planet to choose whether or not they want to move to America.”— Why Did the Anglosphere Go Hog Wild Over Immigration?
How It Spread
The idea spread through a liberal mindset driven by instinctual feelings of moral goodness. Supporters equated backing immigrants with ethical superiority over their opponents, whom they saw as simply bad. [1] This propagation relied on social pressures and a sense of righteousness, reinforcing the assumption in media and academic circles without rigorous scrutiny. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“Liberal thinking on immigration seems no more in depth than: Immigrants are Good and we are Good, while you are Bad, so of course us Goods will support each other in our ultimate triumph over you Bads.”— Why Did the Anglosphere Go Hog Wild Over Immigration?
Resulting Policies
Post-2020, the Biden Administration relaxed border enforcement, deeming tougher measures racist. This led to uncontrolled inflows of migrants across the southern border. [1] The policy reflected a broader institutional shift toward openness, built on the increasingly questioned assumption that such immigration would align with liberal interests. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“they just seemed to feel that it was racist and Trump-like to try hard to keep immigrants out. And then they got surprised when they eased off border enforcement at how many migrants swarmed in, including from places that had sent very few migrants before.”— Why Did the Anglosphere Go Hog Wild Over Immigration?
Harm Caused
Democrats faced political demoralization after their 2024 election loss. Immigrants and nonwhites voted for Trump in unexpected numbers, shattering the party's worldview. [1] This outcome left many in confusion, as growing evidence highlights the assumption's flaws, though recognition is not yet universal. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“they were especially shocked in November 2024 when Donald Trump got returned to power in large part because immigrants and other nonwhites were moving in his direction. That helps explain how demoralized and confused Democrats have been ever since.”— Why Did the Anglosphere Go Hog Wild Over Immigration?
Downfall
Trump's victory in 2024 laid bare the assumption's weaknesses. Immigrants and nonwhites supported him, upending the Democrats' model of good people aligned against conservatives. [1] This event prompted growing recognition that the belief was flawed, with critics pointing to electoral data that challenged the old certainties, even as the debate persists. [1]
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
“But then a lot more of the Good People voted for the ultimate Bad Person, Donald Trump. That’s my theory on America.”— Why Did the Anglosphere Go Hog Wild Over Immigration?
Sources
- [1]