Groups Have Equal Innate Potential

False Assumption: Races and the sexes have the same innate distribution of potential, making all group disparities the result of environmental forces.

Written by FARAgent on February 09, 2026

In the early twentieth century, anthropologist Franz Boas promoted the idea that races and sexes share identical innate potential, attributing group differences solely to environment. This view gained traction among academics and policymakers. By 1965, President Lyndon Johnson endorsed it publicly, stating in a Howard University speech that "ability is not just the product of birth" and disparities stem from "ancient brutality, past injustice, and present prejudice." The assumption underpinned social programs and became orthodoxy in fields like sociology and psychology, with critics like Thomas Sowell later arguing that cultural factors, such as regional habits imported from Britain, explained outcomes like test score gaps between Northern blacks and Southern whites.

The equality thesis held firm through decades, shaping policies in education, criminal justice, and hiring. Dissenters faced backlash. In recent years, researchers challenging it met professional ruin; Noah Carl was fired from Cambridge in 2019 for his work on intelligence, Bo Winegard lost his position at Marietta College in 2020 for similar views, and Stephen Hsu resigned as vice president at Michigan State University that same year amid accusations of promoting hereditarian ideas. Broader harms emerged, including a 2020 incident where a Mexican American utility worker was dismissed for a gesture misinterpreted as a white supremacist symbol, amid rising cancel culture that purged nonconformists from academia and media.

Despite official consensus upholding the assumption, a growing body of dissenters argues it overlooks genetic evidence, pointing to persistent disparities unexplained by environment alone. Critics, including writers at outlets like Aporia Magazine and Substack newsletters, contend that innate differences contribute to outcomes in sports, science, and public health. The debate remains unresolved, with mainstream institutions resisting hereditarian perspectives while challengers gain visibility online.

Status: Mainstream still holds this assumption to be true despite evidence against it

People Involved

In 1965, President Lyndon Johnson endorsed the equality thesis in a public speech, framing it as a call for equal outcomes through environmental reforms. ^[1]
Earlier, anthropologist Franz Boas had promoted environmental explanations for group differences in the early 20th century, even as he noted innate racial disparities in mental traits. ^[1]
By the 21st century, researchers like Noah Carl faced firing from academia for opposing the thesis's links to wokism, while Bo Winegard lost his position for similar challenges. ^[1]
At Michigan State, Stephen Hsu resigned under pressure as an obstacle to social justice tied to the thesis. ^[1]
Tenured professor Amy Wax endured ongoing harassment for questioning cultural equality and racial performance gaps. ^[1][4][5]
Conservative intellectual Thomas Sowell championed cultural explanations for race differences, arguing blacks adopted dysfunctional traits from Southern white rednecks, and dismissed hereditarians as inept. ^[2][5]
Psychologist Arthur Jensen countered with genetic arguments for IQ variations, which Sowell misrepresented. ^[2]
Author Eric Kaufmann proposed legal reforms against wokism without rejecting the thesis. ^[3]
Podcaster Nathan Cofnas warned that the thesis underpins wokism and urged teaching genetic truths. ^[4][6][17]
Critical theorist Herbert Marcuse formalized elite ideas already circulating. ^[5] Mainstream conservatives avoided innate explanations to align with the thesis. ^[6]
Independent scholar Gregory Cochran and anthropologist Henry Harpending proposed evolutionary theories for Ashkenazi IQ in 2005, noting later study cancellations. ^[7]
Harvard's Steven Pinker praised their work, while reporter Nicholas Wade covered it positively. ^[7]
New York Times reporter Mike McIntire later decried racial IQ research as fringe. ^[8]
Neuropsychologist Terry L. Jernigan labeled such studies evil. ^[8]
Professor Bryan J. Pesta was fired after publishing on racial admixture and IQ. ^[8]
Scholar Rob Kurzban exposed academia's rewards for wrong ideas. ^[9]
Historian John Lewis Gaddis confronted theorists ignoring Soviet archives. ^[9] International relations experts rejected evidence to preserve their views. ^[9]
DNA discoverer James D. Watson warned in 2007 of policies assuming equal intelligence, leading to his firing. ^[10]
Author Nathaniel Comfort blamed Watson's views on The Bell Curve. ^[10]
Harvard president Lawrence Summers cited male variability for gender gaps in science, facing backlash and resignation. ^[11]
Biologist Nancy Hopkins fled his talk in distress. ^[11]
Economist E.J. Antoni mentioned variability to interns, sparking scandal. ^[11]
Heritage VP Roger Severino cautioned against sharing it. ^[11]
Reporter Jacob Bogage amplified the controversy. ^[11] Ivy League presidents enforced silence on test score gaps. ^[12]
Journalist Steve Sailer publicized IQ gaps despite notoriety. ^[12]
Commentator Will Stancil accused writer Matthew Yglesias of racism for noting black basketball talent. ^[13]
Author Nikole Hannah-Jones called it a lazy trope. ^[13]
Cognitive scientist Steven Pinker debunked blank slate ideas in 2002, ignored by sociologists. ^[14]
Philosopher John Gray advocated state-imposed individualism. ^[15]
Anthropologists Ashley Montagu, Frank Livingstone, and Theodosius Dobzhansky dissented against biological race. ^[16]
Harvard president Claudine Gay embodied DEI reliance on the thesis until fired. ^[17]
Activist Christopher Rufo critiqued hereditarian approaches. ^[17]
Philosopher John Locke articulated environmental determinism in 1690. ^[18]
Activist Madison Grant warned against it in 1916. ^[18]
Historian Carl Degler documented social scientists' incentives. ^[18]
Paola Ramos promoted race as non-biological, backed by Google AI. ^[19]
Influencers Malcolm and Simone Collins argued otherwise. ^[19]
Biologist Michael Brown split giraffes into species. ^[20]
Geneticist Rasmus Heller noted giraffe gene mixing. ^[20]
Professor Kevin N.

Lala and mathematician Marcus W. Feldman refuted racial substructure. ^[21]
Geneticist L.L. Cavalli-Sforza mapped races but later denied them. ^[21]
Psychologist Arthur Jensen and physicist William Shockley advocated genetic differences. ^[21]
Author Jason Roberts criticized Linnaeus. ^[22]
Reviewer Deborah Blum praised the critique. ^[22]
Anthropologist Elizabeth DiGangi and Jonathan Bethard urged stopping ancestry estimation. ^[23]
Allysha Winburn questioned it post-2020. ^[23]
Kyra Stull defended it. ^[23]
Agustín Fuentes stressed race's social nature. ^[23]
Poet Yolanda Wisher and curator Aubree Penney led Smithsonian events. ^[24]
Professor Samuel J.

Redman and historian James Smalls promoted social construct views. ^[25]
Entrepreneur Craig Venter declared race non-existent in 2000. ^[25]
Analyst Steve Sailer noted African American ancestry patterns. ^[26]

▶ Supporting Quotes (74)

“which was endorsed by President Lyndon Johnson in 1965 when he said: “We seek not just equality as a right and a theory but equality as a fact and equality as a result.””— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“Even the anthropologist Franz Boas, who promoted environmentalism in the early to mid-twentieth century, acknowledged that there are innate differences in the “mental make-up of the negro race and other races,” and that “it would be erroneous to assume...their activities should run in the same line.””— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“Noah Carl and Bo Winegard can’t be fired a second time.”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“Stephen Hsu can’t be forced to resign from his position as vice president for research and graduate studies at Michigan State, because that already happened.”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“if they have a position from which they can’t be easily dismissed (as in the case of Amy Wax), they are subject to endless harassment and punishment.”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“Sowell is the leading conservative proponent of the cultural explanation.”— Thomas Sowell’s Wishful Thinking about Race

“While he mostly avoids ad hominem attacks against hereditarians, he portrays most of them as bumbling half-wits with a history of making baseless and contradictory claims.”— Thomas Sowell’s Wishful Thinking about Race

“In an endnote, Sowell writes: 'Arthur Jensen has suggested that particular regional subgroups of Southern whites might be biologically less capable mentally as a result of in-breeding... But this seems hardly likely to account for lower mental test scores for whites in whole Southern states.'”— Thomas Sowell’s Wishful Thinking about Race

“In his fantastic book, The Third Awokening, Eric Kaufmann proposes a 12-point plan to fight wokism, focusing on legal activism: strengthen protections for free speech, command schools to be politically neutral, and so on.”— Victory without a Hereditarian Revolution?

“In 2017, she suggested that “all cultures are not equal,” and she observed that, on average, black students do not perform as well as white students at Penn Law.”— Race, Wokism, and Academia with Amy Wax

“Contra Richard Hanania who says we should “shut up about race and IQ,””— Race, Wokism, and Academia with Amy Wax

“Amy and I say that we can dewokify the elites by teaching them the truth about race.”— Race, Wokism, and Academia with Amy Wax

“Following Thomas Sowell, mainstream conservatives sometimes attribute racial disparities to cultural differences.”— A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution

“Amy Wax calls this “soft realism” in contrast to “hard realism” (hereditarianism).”— A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution

“Herbert Marcuse said this openly: “What I did is formulate and articulate some ideas and some goals that were in the air at that time. That is about it.””— A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution

“Mainstream conservatives acknowledge the existence of physical sex differences, but they rarely chalk up disparities in, for example, mathematical achievement to differences in innate ability—at least not publicly.”— Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem

“Ultimately, however, the woke system can only be brought down by exposing the Big Lie upon which it is based (the equality thesis), thereby giving elites a reason to change their minds and defect to the right.”— Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem

“My recollection is that Cochran, a New Mexican, was invited in November 2005 to discuss his well-known theory on the possible evolution of Jewish I.Q. at the New Mexico ranch of some philanthropist interested in science named Jeffrey Epstein... Cochran is aware of three proposed studies that got pretty far along before being cancelled.”— I Made the Epstein Files!

“the potentially epochal scientific paper by Gregory Cochran, Henry Harpending, and Jason Hardy entitled The Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence.”— I Made the Epstein Files!

“'It would be hard to overstate how politically incorrect this paper is,' said Steven Pinker, a cognitive scientist at Harvard, noting that it argues for an inherited difference in intelligence between groups. Still, he said, 'it’s certainly a thorough and well-argued paper, not one that can easily be dismissed outright.'”— I Made the Epstein Files!

“in “Researchers Say Intelligence and Diseases May Be Linked in Ashkenazic Genes,”[ June 2, 2005] the NYT’s redoubtable genetics reporter Nicholas Wade reported”— I Made the Epstein Files!

“Mike McIntire, an investigative reporter, has been with The Times since 2003. McIntire is not part of the NYT’s traditionally more or less competent Science section staff. He’s employed by the NYT as an “investigative reporter” and works on topics like the Blake Lively-Justin Baldoni celebrity controversy, gun control, Trump’s tax returns, etc. He has a bachelor’s in poly sci and he seems to know basically less than zero about psychometrics.”— NYT Science Denialism

““It’s evil,” said Dr. Terry L. Jernigan, national co-director of the ABCD Study and a neuropsychologist at the University of California, San Diego.”— NYT Science Denialism

“tenured Cleveland State professor Bryan J. Pesta recently was fired after publishing a paper using the Philadelphia Neurodevelopment Cohort to examine the impact of racial admixture on IQ.”— NYT Science Denialism

“Another important piece of the puzzle is the lack of one particular kind of incentive: penalties for being wrong, even luminously wrong. As far as I know, no (modern) scholar ever got fined, jail time, or even fired for publishing a genuinely stupid idea. Indeed, in many areas of the academy, such behavior can be richly rewarded. (Working to expose the stupidity of such ideas might be punished, however.)”— The civilisational disaster of Anglo-American academe

“Historian John Lewis Gaddis provides an example of the difference between academic approval and reality-testing: When the first documents came out, it was pretty clear that they [the Soviet leadership] really did believe their own ideology. And yet the theorists of International Relations in the West had said the ideology is irrelevant. … And so I can remember going to my Political Science friends and saying, your Theory is not right. We have archival evidence showing that they really did believe the ideology. And my political science friends said, “oh, we don’t want to hear about it. We have to save the Theory. Forget about the archives.””— The civilisational disaster of Anglo-American academe

“the theorists of International Relations in the West had said the ideology is irrelevant. … And my political science friends said, “oh, we don’t want to hear about it. We have to save the Theory. Forget about the archives.””— The civilisational disaster of Anglo-American academe

“Watson fired in 2007 from running the famous Cold Spring Harbor cancer lab he’d built back up over four decades because he was quoted as saying he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours—whereas all the testing says not really.””— Elementary Watson

““James Watson Saw the True Form of DNA. Then It Blinded Him.” Nov. 16, 2025 By Nathaniel Comfort … Near the end of my time at Cold Spring Harbor, I remember seeing Dr. Watson walking around the campus, brandishing a copy of Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein’s new book ‘The Bell Curve,’ which notoriously argued that I.Q. differences between racial groups are genetic.”— Elementary Watson

“Lawrence Summers, a prominent liberal economist and official in the Clinton and Obama administrations, faced scrutiny for remarks reflecting aspects of the variability hypothesis in 2005. The fallout in part led him to resign as president of Harvard University.”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“It notoriously sent MIT biologist Nancy Hopkins fleeing like a Victorian maiden faint from hearing the word "legs" instead of "limbs." She later claimed that she had to escape or, "I would've either blacked out or thrown up."”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“Antoni made the remarks about intelligence in a discussion with summer interns at Heritage in 2024. He said that women’s IQs generally clustered around average scores, while men’s IQs varied more between “geniuses” and low-intelligence individuals”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“Shortly afterward, Roger Severino, Heritage’s vice president of domestic policy, spoke with the interns and said Antoni should not have shared that viewpoint, one of the people said.”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“A shocking scandal reported in the Washington Post’s news columns: Trump’s BLS nominee discussed controversial theory on gender IQ with interns”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“Ivy League presidents know that.”— Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?

“I’ve published a colossal number of words on a huge variety of topics over the decades, but I’m most notorious and denounced for my being not ignorant about the IQ gap.”— Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?

“Will Stancil is accusing NBA fan Matthew Yglesias of being a Richard Hanania-style scientific racist. You see, Yglesias not only believes that blacks tend to be better than average basketball players, but Yglesias also is aware of the fact that Balkans tend to be long on basketball talent as well!”— Stancil: Yglesias is a scientific racist!

“Yglesias not only believes that blacks tend to be better than average basketball players, but Yglesias also is aware of the fact that Balkans tend to be long on basketball talent as well!”— Stancil: Yglesias is a scientific racist!

“Nikole Hannah-Jones, the 1619 Project amateur crank historian, weighs in with how she just hates it when when whites mention the NBA, “the laziest and most inanely common “racism can’t exist because of overreprensentation” trope because she’s never figured out a counter-argument other than getting really mad.”— Stancil: Yglesias is a scientific racist!

“Pinker’s classic, The Blank Slate, utterly debunked the blank slate assumption. It has been duly ignored by the vast majority of social scientists, and not just sociologists.”— Sociology's Pervasively Dubious Assumptions

“Thus, philosopher John Gray wants the leviathan state to impose a levelling individualism without any sense that individualism itself is the creation of a particular cultural matrix.”— Where do we go from here?

“Since at least the 1940s, intellectuals have raised objections to the concept of race, with more enthusiastic dissenters declaring it a dangerous and divisive myth that encourages invidious prejudices and ethnic factionalism (See, for example, Montagu, Livingstone & Dobzhansky, Sesardic, and Winegard, Winegard, & Anomaly for discussion).”— The case for race realism

“In 1962, for example, Livingstone asserted, “There are no races, only clines” (p. 279).”— The case for race realism

“I claim that the only way to defeat it is through a hereditarian revolution. Show that the equality thesis is wrong, and wokism will be impossible.”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“Owning the libs by getting Harvard President Claudine Gay fired”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“The crux of Cofnas’s argument is that abstract argument and scientific rationality govern, or, at least, should govern, the world.”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“The empirical premise of wokism was first articulated by John Locke in 1690 when he said that if you or I had been born in South Africa, we would be exactly like Africans and vice versa.”— Was I Wrong about Woke?

“His ideas were picked up by the French revolutionaries, then scientists like Alfred Russel Wallace, Alexander von Humboldt, Theodor Waitz, Franz Boas, and Margaret Mead, and became a tenet of leftism and then mainstream conservatism.”— Was I Wrong about Woke?

“For what it’s worth, in his 1916 book, The Passing of the Great Race, Madison Grant (a leading American anti-immigration activist and Nordic supremacist) attributed the “widespread and fatuous belief in the power of environment” to “the dogma of the brotherhood of man, derived in turn from the loose thinkers of the French Revolution and their American mimics.””— Was I Wrong about Woke?

“Carl Degler points out that, in addition, social scientists had professional incentives to downplay the influence of biology on both individual and group differences in order to increase the perceived importance of social forces.”— Was I Wrong about Woke?

“I asked Google’s AI and it said the dizty nepobaby Paola Ramos, daughter of Univision talking head Jorge Ramos, had The Science on her side and the fertility influencer couple Malcolm and Simone Collins were WRONG.”— Does Race Exist?

““A giraffe is not a giraffe, so to speak,” said Michael Brown, an author of the assessment.”— Should Human Biodiversity Be as Respectable as Giraffe Biodiversity?

“Rasmus Heller, a population geneticist at the University of Copenhagen who carried out the 2024 study on giraffe DNA, cautioned that drawing sharp lines between evolving populations can be tricky. “Nature doesn’t fit nicely into species,” said Dr. Heller...”— Should Human Biodiversity Be as Respectable as Giraffe Biodiversity?

“Kevin N. Lala, formerly Kevin N. Laland, is an extremely white-looking professor at the extremely white-looking U. of Saint Andrews:”— Lala Land

“Marcus Feldman is an Australian Jewish mathematician at Stanford who worked with L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, the famous Stanford population geneticist.”— Lala Land

“he got more worried about being cancelled and became a strident promulagator of the Race Does Not Exist coventional wisdom.”— Lala Land

“Berkeley psychology professor Arthur Jensen’s Harvard Educational Review article “How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?” Jensen used the high estimated value of the within-population statistic heritability to argue that such a large genetic contribution to measured intelligence made it impossible for interventions by society to reduce the IQ difference between the populations of White and non-White Americans.”— Lala Land

“the contemporaneous racist speeches by Stanford physicist William Shockley, who openly advocated eugenics, received much wider media attention.”— Lala Land

“Jason Roberts, the author of “Every Living Thing,” is not a fan of the founding father of taxonomy, whom he rather hilariously describes as “a Swedish doctor with a diploma-mill medical degree and a flair for self-promotion.””— No Vibe Shift Visible in the Pulitzer Prizes

“Roberts stands openly on the side of Buffon, rather than his “profoundly prejudiced” rival.”— No Vibe Shift Visible in the Pulitzer Prizes

““Ancestry estimation is race science, pure and simple,” says DiGangi, who is Black and biracial.”— Latest Rationalization: Race Doesn't Exist, But Subraces Do

““We can’t] assume that our work is not harmful,” says Bethard, who is white.”— Latest Rationalization: Race Doesn't Exist, But Subraces Do

“But Winburn, who is white, is now questioning whether she should continue to do so.”— Latest Rationalization: Race Doesn't Exist, But Subraces Do

““Right now, the reality is that social race is part of how people identify in the United States, and that follows them [in death],” says Stull, who is white.”— Latest Rationalization: Race Doesn't Exist, But Subraces Do

“The fact that ancestry estimation sometimes works “does not in any way, shape, or form mean that [races] are biological categories,” stresses Agustín Fuentes, an anthropologist at Princeton University who is Hispanic and white.”— Latest Rationalization: Race Doesn't Exist, But Subraces Do

“Yolanda Wisher is a black poetess who sings and recites her poetry (which “focuses on the experience of being African-American”) in front of a jazz band called Yolanda Wisher and the Afroeaters.”— World War Hair at the Smithsonian

“Aubree Penney (b. 1990, US) is a fat, disabled Memphis-raised, Dallas-based curator, artist, writer, and project manager. Her work addresses power dynamics in art display, confronting the impossibility of neutrality or equity in institutional structures.”— World War Hair at the Smithsonian

“Samuel J. Redman, a history professor at University of Massachusetts Amherst who has written about scientific racism, said that “the executive order is troubling and out of step with the current consensus.””— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

“James Smalls, an art historian who advised the curators of the exhibition and wrote for its catalog, said there had been clear examples in the past of sculpture being used to suggest that some races were superior to others.”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

“we’ve had huge advances in the 21st century in DNA scans since DNA entrepreneur Craig Venter more or less socially constructed the Race Does Not Exist conventional wisdom in his speech at the 2000 White House Human Genome project ceremony.”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

“This was something I noticed back at the beginning of this century: African-Americans who don’t have a recent white parent or grandparent will tend to have some white ancestry, but less than 50%. It’s an inevitable by-product of the strong cultural norm against white-black intermarriage that was dominant in the U.S. until recent generations.”— Can You Identify the Races of America?

Organizations Involved

In the 1960s, the U.S. government under Johnson enacted civil rights laws based on the equality thesis. ^[1] By 2020, organizations like the American Medical Association and American Ornithological Society pledged antiracism allegiance amid upheavals. ^[1] Michigan State University forced Hsu's resignation to enforce social justice. ^[1] Emmanuel College at Cambridge targeted Cofnas, leading to a lawsuit. ^[1] The University of Pennsylvania punished Wax for her statements. ^[4] Academia, government, and education latched onto critical theory, with elites seeing disparities as moral wrongs. ^[5] Google exemplified corporate wokism with post-election crying sessions. ^[5] Elite universities, mostly in blue states, aligned with the thesis through woke ideology. ^[6] Conservative think tanks like the American Enterprise Institute and Manhattan Institute struggled to compete. ^[6] The New York Times briefly covered Ashkenazi IQ theories in 2005 but avoided follow-ups. ^[7] The Economist published sympathetically that year. ^[7] Later, the New York Times demanded crackdowns on racial IQ research. ^[8] The NIH funded the ABCD study but restricted data after misuse claims. ^[8] Anglo-American academe imposed Theory courses in the 1990s, enforcing blank slate ideas. ^[9] Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory fired Watson in 2007. ^[10] Mainstream press gloated over his firing. ^[10] The Washington Post framed variability as controversial. ^[11] Heritage Foundation cautioned on the topic. ^[11] Ivy League schools like Harvard enforced taboos on gaps. ^[12] The American Sociological Association structured sections around social construction. ^[14] Sociology faculties maintained leftwing homogeneity. ^[14] International law academics promoted blank slate visions. ^[15] Universities, corporations, and media allowed progressive narratives. ^[16] Harvard enforced DEI through leaders like Gay. ^[17] Cognitive elites staffed key institutions with DEI backing. ^[17] The Manhattan Institute tried building anti-woke forces. ^[17] Social scientists embedded the thesis as orthodoxy. ^[18] The AABA and NHGRI denied biological races. ^[19] Wikipedia labeled race realism pseudoscience. ^[20] The IUCN recognized giraffe species. ^[20] PNAS published papers refuting racial structure. ^[21] Stanford hosted Feldman and Cavalli-Sforza. ^[21] The Pulitzer committee awarded a book criticizing racial categories. ^[22] The New York Times endorsed the critique. ^[22] The American Academy of Forensic Sciences drafted guidelines avoiding racial categories. ^[23] The Smithsonian promoted race as social construct in exhibits. ^[24][25] Monument Lab partnered on events. ^[24] The AABA issued denying statements. ^[25]

▶ Supporting Quotes (42)

“Stephen Hsu can’t be forced to resign from his position as vice president for research and graduate studies at Michigan State, because that already happened.”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“note that I am raising money for a lawsuit against Emmanuel College and potentially the University.”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“Virtually every mainstream institution in the US from the American Ornithological Society to the American Medical Association ritualistically pledged allegiance to antiracism”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“She has been fighting for her job ever since.”— Race, Wokism, and Academia with Amy Wax

“But, in fact, academia, government agencies, and the education establishment latched onto critical theory because the elites who controlled these institutions were already woke.”— A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution

“There is no law that said Google had to have a company-wide crying session after Trump was elected, or that their employees had to shed so many tears.”— A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution

“In the top 50, there are 28 American universities, of which 23 are in blue states.”— Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem

“The annual expenditures at the conservative American Enterprise Institute are less than $50 million. At the Manhattan Institute, they’re less than $20 million.”— Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem

“Here’s the June 3, 2005 article from the New York Times’ Science section: “Researchers Say Intelligence and Diseases May Be Linked in Ashkenazic Genes.””— I Made the Epstein Files!

“The Economist headlined its anonymous article: “Natural Genius? The evolution of intelligence: The high intelligence of Ashkenazi Jews may be a result of their persecuted past.” (June 2, 2005).”— I Made the Epstein Files!

“Not surprisingly, demands to shut down scientific research are growing as the years go by and scientists keep discovering ever more non-woke facts. Hence, the New York Times runs a protracted 3,900 word article in its news section about the pressing need to crack down on science.”— NYT Science Denialism

“As I’ve been reporting for many years, the National Institutes of Health’s Adolescent Brain Cognition Development tracking study is one of most impressive scientific efforts to date. Costing $440 million taxpayer dollars, it recruited a panel of over 10,000 children and subjected them to just about any test imaginable — IQ, DNA, MRI, etc.”— NYT Science Denialism

“it was in the 1990s that various tendencies start to reach critical mass... via the imposition of compulsory Theory courses... entire academic disciplines are built on mastery of Theory.”— The civilisational disaster of Anglo-American academe

“Watson fired in 2007 from running the famous Cold Spring Harbor cancer lab he’d built back up over four decades”— Elementary Watson

“Instead, the press is still gloating about his downfall.”— Elementary Watson

“from the New York Times opinion section: James Watson Saw the True Form of DNA. Then It Blinded Him. Nov. 16, 2025 By Nathaniel Comfort”— Elementary Watson

“Trump’s BLS nominee discussed controversial theory on gender IQ with interns E.J. Antoni told interns from the Heritage Foundation that women’s IQs clustered around average scores, while men have more geniuses and unintelligent individuals”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“Severino told the interns that Heritage had no official position on the question of gender IQ differences”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“if admitted only on academic talent, Harvard’s freshman class would be down around 1% black”— Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?

“The Sociology of Aging emphasizes that aging and the life course are socially organized. Crime, Law, and Deviance assumes that deviance is socially constructed and that law reflects power and inequality. Even the section devoted to Biology and Society largely focuses on how biology is shaped by politics and social forces, rather than on how biological constraints shape social organization.”— Sociology's Pervasively Dubious Assumptions

“Sociology is overwhelmingly leftwing, and this is well documented. Surveys and analyses consistently show that large majorities of sociology faculty support the Democratic Party, that conservatives are vanishingly rare, and that explicitly Marxist or neo-Marxist orientations are unusually common relative to other disciplines. In practical terms, moderate liberals function as the right-most boundary of acceptable views within the field.”— Sociology's Pervasively Dubious Assumptions

“International law academics tend to be particularly prone to Platonic Guardian arrogance. Striking moral poses is part of the field’s attraction. Public international law is not law—there are no remedies, beyond declarative statements—so international law academics’ pontifications are not subject to reliable and effective reality-tests.”— Where do we go from here?

“Estimating the cost of allowing the progressive racial narrative to thrive at universities, corporations, and media outlets is exceedingly difficult, but this cost is almost certainly higher than the (much feared) cost of promoting candid conversations about race differences.”— The case for race realism

“Owning the libs by getting Harvard President Claudine Gay fired or shutting down cancer research”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“Cognitive elites remain overwhelmingly on the side of DEI.”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“After shutting down the Logos program, Rufo hired some people who appear to be gender-critical former(?) leftists who reputedly may not have even voted Republican.”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“Major scientific organizations, including the American Association of Biological Anthropologists (AABA) and the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), have concluded that there is no biological basis for dividing humans into distinct races.”— Does Race Exist?

“Wikipedia has been taken over by a clique of leftist nuts:”— Should Human Biodiversity Be as Respectable as Giraffe Biodiversity?

“One species is officially four, the International Union for Conservation of Nature announced on Thursday.”— Should Human Biodiversity Be as Respectable as Giraffe Biodiversity?

“From Proceedings of the National Academy of Science: Genes, culture, and scientific racism Kevin N. Lala and Marcus W. Feldman”— Lala Land

“Marcus Feldman is an Australian Jewish mathematician at Stanford who worked with L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, the famous Stanford population geneticist.”— Lala Land

“This year, the winner, Every Living Thing: The Great and Deadly Race to Know All Life by Jason Roberts, dared portray two Dead White European Males, the 18th naturalists Linnaeus and Buffon. But the book was recognized because of its efforts to have Linnaeus cancelled for not believing in today’s Race Does Not Exist conventional wisdom.”— No Vibe Shift Visible in the Pulitzer Prizes

“Roberts’s exploration centers on the competing work of Linnaeus and another scientific pioneer, the French mathematician and naturalist Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon.”— No Vibe Shift Visible in the Pulitzer Prizes

“A committee of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences’s standards board is now hammering out a new standard that would, if adopted, direct professionals away from racial categories and toward more specific social and biological populations, such as Japanese or Hmong instead of Asian.”— Latest Rationalization: Race Doesn't Exist, But Subraces Do

“Once widely respected as a symbol of American excellence and a global icon of cultural achievement, the Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology.”— World War Hair at the Smithsonian

“the Smithsonian American Art Museum today features “The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture,” an exhibit representing that “[s]ocieties including the United States have used race to establish and maintain systems of power, privilege, and disenfranchisement.” The exhibit further claims that “sculpture has been a powerful tool in promoting scientific racism” and promotes the view that race is not a biological reality but a social construct, stating “Race is a human invention.””— World War Hair at the Smithsonian

“SAAM has partnered with Monument Lab, a nonprofit public art, history, and design studio based in Philadelphia, for an engaging series of guided conversations about The Shape of Power exhibition.”— World War Hair at the Smithsonian

“The exhibition, called “The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture,” explores how, for more than 200 years, sculpture has both shaped and reflected attitudes about race in the United States.”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

“"His executive order faulted an exhibit which 'promotes the view that race is not a biological reality but a social construct,” a widely held position in the scientific community."”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

““Race does not provide an accurate representation of human biological variation,” the statement reads. “Humans are not divided biologically into distinct continental types or racial genetic clusters.”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

The Foundation

The equality thesis gained footing in the 1960s as elite orthodoxy, positing identical innate potentials across races and sexes, with disparities blamed on environment. ^[1] It seemed credible then, but persistent gaps despite interventions now prompt growing questions. ^[1] Sowell argued redneck culture from Britain caused deficits in Southern whites and blacks, drawing on historical stereotypes, yet critics note it overlooks genetics and uniform conditions. ^[2] He cited Northern blacks outscoring Southern whites on tests, attributing it to culture, but within-state gaps suggest selective migration and heredity. ^[2] Pre-Civil War free blacks' success was linked to cultural advantages, ignoring their European ancestry. ^[2] Mulatto-black differences were deemed cultural, bypassing genetic correlations. ^[2] The thesis held disparities like IQ, wealth, and incarceration stemmed from fixable environments, appearing reasonable post-legal equality but challenged when outcomes lagged. ^[3] Avoiding race-IQ talk, as Hanania urged, reinforced it amid charged debates. ^[4] Post-WWII, it countered biological determinism, but global patterns in IQ and status raise doubts. ^[5] Soft realism blamed culture alone, plausible conservatively but questioned for ignoring genetics in consistent patterns across groups. ^[5] It served as a moral baseline for left and right, yet sub-beliefs in oppression-only causes ignore biology. ^[6] Conservatives rejected innate cognitive gaps, propping environmental views. ^[6] Ashkenazi IQ advantages were culturally explained, despite test data, fueling denial of genetic disease links. ^[7] Lay views of slow evolution made recent selection implausible, supporting nurture. ^[7] Geneticists dismissed racial IQ biology, citing bias, but psychometricians point to enduring 15-point gaps. ^[8] Blank slate ideas dominated social sciences, adapting French Theory, yet evolutionary biology's absence misleads on trait variations. ^[9] Elites blamed white evil for sub-Saharan underperformance, ignoring evolutionary divergence. ^[10] IQ data was dismissed, assuming social fixes. ^[10] Gender science gaps were socialization-only, ignoring variability data. ^[11] Reformers promised gap closure via tricks, but endurance challenges that. ^[12] The Bell Curve showed tail gaps, privately cited but publicly taboo. ^[12] NBA overrepresentation was a trope rejecting innate athletics, despite biological variety. ^[13] Sociology assumed blank slate malleability, ignoring biology. ^[14] Phenomena as socially constructed generated beliefs in alterable inequalities. ^[14] Blank slate promised harmony via cultural removal, but critics note evolved variations. ^[15] Root causes sought social explanations, bypassing innate traits. ^[15] Neoliberalism assumed uniform incentives, neglecting culture. ^[15] Race as social construct seemed credible mid-20th century, but genetic ancestry links challenge it. ^[16] Superficial variation sub-belief is contradicted by deeper differences. ^[16] Psychological traits unvaried by selection is questioned by genetics. ^[16] Disparities from racism ignores genetics. ^[16] Clinal variation overlooked barriers. ^[16] The thesis underpinned wokism, seeming credible via taboos, but sub-beliefs in moral emergencies ignore nature. ^[17] It drew from Lockean ideas and incentives, yet genetic factors question it. ^[18] 99.9% DNA sharing propped denial, but structure is noted. ^[19] Subspecies criteria failed, ignoring fixation indices. ^[19] Clines ignored isolation. ^[19] Wikipedia deemed biological races pseudoscience. ^[20] Giraffe taxonomy shifted on evidence, contrasting human denial. ^[20] Gene-culture studies mimicked heritability, but clusters in traits challenge. ^[21] Cavalli-Sforza's maps showed races, downplayed later. ^[21] Linnaeus's categories were biased, propping denial, but DNA contradicts superficial claims. ^[22] Buffon's environmentalism is undercut by genetics. ^[22] Variation within races and no checklists ignore predictive skull data. ^[23] Exhibits cited race for power, ignoring genetics. ^[24] 99.9% similarity is challenged by ancestry tests. ^[25] Colonial origins ignore clustering. ^[25] Clinal views from small studies are exposed by genomic clusters. ^[26]

▶ Supporting Quotes (55)

“The empirical premise that generates wokism—the equality thesis—has been the orthodoxy among establishment intellectuals since the 1960s, if not earlier. ... Races and the sexes have the same innate distribution of potential, ergo all group disparities must be the result of environmental forces. Given the persistence of massive disparities, there is a moral emergency”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“Sowell argues that redneck culture was imported from the lawless border regions and backwaters of Britain from which the majority of colonial settlers in the South emigrated: the Scottish Highlands, Ulster, Wales, and the northern and western uplands of England.”— Thomas Sowell’s Wishful Thinking about Race

“Sowell touts the fact that that blacks in four northern states averaged higher scores than whites in four southern states on the Army Alpha test administered to recruits during World War I (pp. 23, 31).”— Thomas Sowell’s Wishful Thinking about Race

“Sowell asserts that 'the historical and cultural antecedents of [the] success [of the descendants of slaves freed before the Civil War] are undeniable,' and refers to 'the cultural head starts of this segment of the black population.'”— Thomas Sowell’s Wishful Thinking about Race

“Sowell’s chain of reasoning goes as follows: (1) crime rates and school attendance aren’t “genetically predetermined”; (2) mulatto and black communities differed in these outcomes; (3) therefore the differences between the populations must be due to culture rather than genes.”— Thomas Sowell’s Wishful Thinking about Race

“Suppose you believe that all groups have exactly the same distribution of abilities. Any disparities in outcome must be the result of environmental factors that could theoretically be corrected. As long as there are enormous gaps in IQ, wealth, health, crime rates, and so on, there is a moral emergency to correct the environment and achieve equal outcomes.”— Victory without a Hereditarian Revolution?

“The race taboo arose in response to the fact that, contrary to the predictions of the environmentalists, legal equality in the 1960s failed to produce equality of outcome.”— Victory without a Hereditarian Revolution?

“It’s essentially asking people not to care too much about the fact that environmental conditions have caused black Americans to have a 15-point IQ deficit, one-tenth the wealth, and 4 times the incarceration rate compared to whites.”— Victory without a Hereditarian Revolution?

“Contra Richard Hanania who says we should “shut up about race and IQ,” Amy and I say that we can dewokify the elites by teaching them the truth about race.”— Race, Wokism, and Academia with Amy Wax

“If all races and sexes have the same innate distributions of psychological traits, disparities in socioeconomic status must be due to environmental factors.”— A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution

“But “culture” is not the reason why we see the same basic pattern of racial disparities among population-representative groups of sub-Saharan Africans, Europeans, and East Asians wherever they go all over the world.”— A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution

“Both the mainstream left and right believe that innate cognitive ability and temperament are distributed equally among races, and probably the sexes, too.”— Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem

“(Mainstream conservatives acknowledge the existence of physical sex differences, but they rarely chalk up disparities in, for example, mathematical achievement to differences in innate ability—at least not publicly.)”— Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem

“During the last three decades, Jews have made up 50% of the top two hundred intellectuals, 40 percent of American Nobel Prize Winners in science and economics... Ashkenazim generally do well in IQ tests, scoring 12-15 points above the mean value of 100...”— I Made the Epstein Files!

“Contrary to the layman’s assumption that Darwinian selection can only putter along at geological speeds, the authors mathematically demonstrate that the 35 generations during these nine centuries offered enough time for mutations conferring greater business acumen to spread widely among the Ashkenazi.”— I Made the Epstein Files!

“All that remains in dispute among intelligence researchers is why African-Americans average lower I.Q.s: the mainstream view among psychometricians suggests that both nature and nurture play a role, But there remains a definite fringe of scientific experts devoted to the extremist position that only nurture could possibly influence the gap in average intelligence seen over and over and over among different races.”— NYT Science Denialism

“blank slate views of humanity are simply false. We know that we cannot expect all human populations, all human groups—even within societies—to have the same distributions of genetic and cultural traits relevant to social outcomes. Yet, there are entire industries, disciplines, and realms of discourse, that operate on the basis that differences in outcomes between groups is an automatic moral failure and a presumptive indicator of malicious social forces.”— The civilisational disaster of Anglo-American academe

“This is especially so with adaptations of French Theory, as evolutionary biology had almost entirely failed to penetrate even French Biology, let alone wider French thought.”— The civilisational disaster of Anglo-American academe

“the liberal establishment is determined to die in the ditch of swearing, on the rare occasions when it is forced to admit that sub-Saharans perform worse on average on cognitively demanding tasks, that the IQ gap must be because white people are just plain evil, rather than admit that perhaps that’s the kind of difference you shouldn’t be surprised to see evolve in the 50,000 or so years since the Out of Africa event separated the races.”— Elementary Watson

““all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours—whereas all the testing says not really.””— Elementary Watson

“Finally, Summers explained why, as an economist and a follower of the brain sciences, he doubted the popular view that discrimination in socialization and hiring primarily accounted for the sex disparity.”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“Up through about 2012 was the Educational Reform Era when billionaires were sure they had found various One Weird Tricks to eliminate test score gaps. For a dozen years, we were this close to being able to boost black test scores by a standard deviation while not allowing white test scores to go up at all.”— Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?

“The test score gap at the right edge of the Bell Curve is just that severe.”— Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?

““the laziest and most inanely common “racism can’t exist because of overreprensentation” trope”— Stancil: Yglesias is a scientific racist!

“But then along came the dogma of diversity, so awareness of variety become unseemly among the better sort of people.”— Stancil: Yglesias is a scientific racist!

“These orientations rest on a deeper and largely unexamined assumption about human nature: the blank slate view. This view treats human beings as born without meaningful innate differences and assumes that the default state of humanity is sameness and full malleability. Once this assumption is in place, differences in behavior or outcomes—whether between individuals or groups—are interpreted as unnatural products of social structure rather than as the result of mixed causal processes involving biology, psychology, culture, institutions, and environment.”— Sociology's Pervasively Dubious Assumptions

“This orientation is visible across the entire American Sociological Association section structure. If one asks what the dominant conclusions of a given subfield are, the answer is almost always that the phenomenon in question is socially constructed, shaped by power relations, and maintained through inequality.”— Sociology's Pervasively Dubious Assumptions

“If differences are socially constructed, then unequal outcomes are taken to be inherently unjust. If there are no meaningful natural constraints, then all social arrangements are presumed to be fully alterable. Social change therefore becomes normatively good rather than empirically contingent.”— Sociology's Pervasively Dubious Assumptions

“The great hope of the blank slate is perfect human harmony because of our innate sameness. So, if we just strip away the accretions of difference—including our varied cultural heritages by “de-colonising” everything—harmony will be achieved.”— Where do we go from here?

“The propensity to look for “root causes” has blank slate roots. Such approaches shy away from considering how people vary in conscientiousness, aggressiveness, propensity to violence, patience, etc.”— Where do we go from here?

“One can see in neoliberalism implicit blank-slate presumptions. Everything is understood as a matter of incentives, of sticks and carrots. Get the incentive structure right, and all will be well. Show me the incentives—assumed in neoliberal Theory to operate identically across all human groups—and I will show you the outcome.”— Where do we go from here?

“Race is a social construct. Although humans vary genetically, they do not vary in predictable, patterned ways that can be classified as races.”— The case for race realism

“Human populations vary primarily only in superficial features, such as skin color, although they may vary in some underlying traits such as blood types or lactase persistence.”— The case for race realism

“Human populations do not vary in psychological traits and tendencies that were shaped by natural, sexual, or social selection.”— The case for race realism

“Human population disparities, which are large and numerous, are caused by pervasive racism.”— The case for race realism

“The claim that human variation is almost wholly clinal and thus inconsistent with the traditional concept of race has been around for many years.”— The case for race realism

“Empirical premise (equality thesis): All races and sexes have on average the same innate distribution of socially relevant traits.”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“The persistence of massive group disparities presents us with a moral emergency to fix the environment and bring about equality of outcome.”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“If all races and sexes have the same innate distributions of psychological traits, disparities in socioeconomic status must be due to environmental factors.”— Was I Wrong about Woke?

“Any two humans share approximately 99.9% of their DNA. The 0.1% of variation that exists is primarily found between individuals rather than between “racial” groups.”— Does Race Exist?

“In biology, a “race” is often synonymous with a subspecies. To qualify as a subspecies, a group must have a high level of genetic differentiation (typically a threshold of 25%) and a unique evolutionary history. Human populations do not meet these criteria, as we are too genetically similar and have mixed too frequently throughout history.”— Does Race Exist?

“Human physical traits, such as skin color or hair texture, vary gradually (clinally) across geographic space rather than in discrete, separate categories. There are no sharp boundaries that divide one “race” from another.”— Does Race Exist?

“Scientific racism, sometimes termed biological racism, is the pseudoscientific belief that the human species is divided into biologically distinct taxa called "races",[1][2][3], and that empirical evidence exists to support or justify racial discrimination, racial inferiority, or racial superiority.[4][5][6][7] ... Modern scientific consensus rejects this view as being irreconcilable with modern genetic research.[8] Scientific racism misapplies, misconstrues, or distorts anthropology (notably physical anthropology), craniometry, evolutionary biology, and other disciplines or pseudo-disciplines...”— Should Human Biodiversity Be as Respectable as Giraffe Biodiversity?

“Before the mid-20th century, scientific racism was accepted throughout the scientific community, but it is no longer considered scientific.[5][6] ... For more than 260 years, scientists have consider giraffes a single species.”— Should Human Biodiversity Be as Respectable as Giraffe Biodiversity?

“In fact, the reticulated giraffes are hybrids; their ancestry is about evenly split between northern giraffes and southern giraffes.”— Should Human Biodiversity Be as Respectable as Giraffe Biodiversity?

“Their first models showed that parent-to-offspring cultural transmission could produce the appearance of high heritability even though the transmission was not genetic, disproving Jensen’s claim that high heritability implied traits would be difficult to alter.”— Lala Land

“This is Cavalli-Sforza's description of the map that is the capstone of his half century of labor in human genetics: "The color map of the world shows very distinctly the differences that we know exist among the continents: Africans (yellow), Caucasoids (green), Mongoloids … (purple), and Australian Aborigines (red).”— Lala Land

“He placed white Europeans firmly at the top. Homo sapiens Europaeus, as he called it, was blond, blue-eyed, “gentle, acute, inventive.” By contrast, Homo sapiens Afer was dark and, in Linnaeus’s definition, “slow, sly and careless”; Homo sapiens Americanus was red-skinned and short-tempered.”— No Vibe Shift Visible in the Pulitzer Prizes

““The dissimilarities are merely external,” he wrote in 1758, “the alterations of nature but superficial.” Living things were adaptable, he insisted, shaped by the environment.”— No Vibe Shift Visible in the Pulitzer Prizes

“There’s no checklist of skeletal, physical, or genetic traits shared by all people of a certain race; in fact, there’s far more variation within racial categories than between them.”— Latest Rationalization: Race Doesn't Exist, But Subraces Do

“an exhibit representing that “[s]ocieties including the United States have used race to establish and maintain systems of power, privilege, and disenfranchisement.””— World War Hair at the Smithsonian

“The exhibit further claims that “sculpture has been a powerful tool in promoting scientific racism” and promotes the view that race is not a biological reality but a social construct, stating “Race is a human invention.””— World War Hair at the Smithsonian

“the wall text in the show, which notes that humans are “99.9 percent genetically the same” and introduces part of a statement on race and racism by the American Association of Biological Anthropologists.”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

““Instead, the Western concept of race must be understood as a classification system that emerged from, and in support of, European colonialism, oppression, and discrimination.” “It thus does not have its roots in biological reality”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

“The extent to which human genetic diversity is characterized by clusters of closely related individuals, i.e., population structure, versus clines of continuous genetic variation has long been a subject of interest.”— Can You Identify the Races of America?

How It Spread

The equality thesis spread through generational education, evolving from a noble lie to genuine institutional belief. ^[1] Media spiked social-justice terms around 2012, amplifying it amid feminization and social media. ^[1] Sowell's theory influenced right-wing circles via books like 'Black Rednecks and White Liberals.' ^[2] The race taboo emerged around 1965 after failed predictions, spreading via moral pressures. ^[3] It blocked conservatives from resisting wokism's logic. ^[3] Elite academia punished dissent, as with Wax. ^[4] From 1950s orthodoxy, it propagated through law and education, with elites adopting critical theory. ^[5] Wokism extended it under Christian morals, attracting smart adherents. ^[6] Mainstream acceptance made alternatives taboo, drawing elites to wokism. ^[6] Political correctness tabood Ashkenazi IQ talk post-2005. ^[7] The New York Times framed racial IQ as debunked, shifting from 1988 acknowledgments. ^[8] Post-1991, academe focused inward, ramping sensitivity and cancel culture. ^[9] Social media linked elite graduates, spreading conformism. ^[9] Incentives favored mythic ideas. ^[9] Media reinforced taboos via Watson coverage. ^[10] Prestige press framed realism as failing. ^[10] Outrage over Summers propagated silence. ^[11] Media scandals buried supporting data. ^[11] Local reports treated gaps as isolated, sustaining ignorance. ^[12] Social pressure deemed awareness indecent. ^[12] Platforms like BlueSky accused factual notes of racism. ^[13] Sociology's frameworks constrained research to constructionism. ^[14] It diverged from classical views toward pathology. ^[14] Elite strategies spread delusions via moral signaling. ^[15] Shared beliefs aided coordination. ^[15] Orthodoxy suppressed contradictions via sanctions. ^[16] Dissenters' success mainstreamed constructionism. ^[16] Wokism became elite ideology pre-institutions. ^[17] Taboos reinforced it socially. ^[17] Scientists like Boas, leftists, and conservatives embedded it. ^[18] Dogma and revolution ideas propagated it. ^[18] Google AI stated it as consensus. ^[19] Organizations issued denying statements. ^[19] Wikipedia edited entries against realism. ^[20] Consensus pushed social construct, but public sees biology. ^[21] Fear led to promulgation. ^[21] Pulitzer and reviews endorsed critiques. ^[22] 2020 reckoning amplified abandonment calls. ^[23] Exhibits spread social views. ^[24] Consensus tut-tutted biology. ^[24] Academics questioned criticisms. ^[25] Media called it scientific. ^[25] Pre-genome consensus claimed no Taino survivors, despite traits. ^[26]

▶ Supporting Quotes (44)

“Each subsequent generation of children was subjected to increasingly intensive brainwashing until the Noble Lie was genuinely believed.”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“Circa 2012, there was a spike in the use of social-justice terms like “mansplaining,” “safe spaces,” “sexist,” “racist,” and “white supremacy” in major media outlets.”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“Practically every American intellectual on the right has been influenced by him in some way.”— Thomas Sowell’s Wishful Thinking about Race

“Sowell presents his cultural theory of race differences in “Black Rednecks and White Liberals,” which is the first chapter of a book of the same name published in 2005.”— Thomas Sowell’s Wishful Thinking about Race

“Kaufmann says that wokism began with the “big bang” of the race taboo around 1965. I agree with that. ... The race taboo is wokism.”— Victory without a Hereditarian Revolution?

“The taboo against hereditarianism makes it impossible for conservatives and classical liberals to resist the logic of wokism.”— Victory without a Hereditarian Revolution?

“In this episode we discuss strategies for defeating wokism.”— Race, Wokism, and Academia with Amy Wax

“The empirical and moral premises that motivate wokism had become the orthodoxy among elites by the 1950s. It took a couple generations for the intellectual class to impose its ideology on the rest of society through the law and education system.”— A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution

“wokism is simply what follows from taking the equality thesis of race and sex differences seriously, given a background of Christian morality.”— Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem

“Smart people are disproportionately attracted to wokism in large part because it offers a more intellectually coherent explanation for the major issue of our time, which is the persistence of racial disparities.”— Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem

“Ashkenazi intelligence is one of those facts that are obvious, important, and interesting, yet, is largely unmentionable in polite society… at least until this week... Political correctness doesn’t keep facts from being talked about—just from being written about in an intelligent, constructive manner.”— I Made the Epstein Files!

“Recent mentions of racial I.Q. gaps in The New York Times primarily frame the subject as a debunked or unscientific “race science” used to promote division. While the Times historically reported on the existence of these gaps as significant data points, modern coverage focuses on their closing or the misuse of data by “fringe researchers”.”— NYT Science Denialism

“It was after the end of the Cold War—with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991—that things began to shift... sensitivity about language starts ramping up: a sensitivity that made it easier and easier to functionally exclude working class voices from public discourse, due to their alleged moral vulgarity (racist, sexist, xenophobic, transphobic, etc.). ... it was in the 1990s that what later became known as cancel culture began to take off—albeit mainly pioneered by activists operating on behalf of Jews”— The civilisational disaster of Anglo-American academe

“Especially given the way social media now links academe, the media, the entertainment and literary-artistic worlds so readily and rapidly.”— The civilisational disaster of Anglo-American academe

“Academe does not work on the basis of penalties for falsity, it operates on the basis of gains from approval—and penalties from disapproval—by fellow academics within the various disciplines... the fact that tenure provides a lifetime appointments cuts two ways: it’s a fantastic arrangement if you’re liked, respected, and well-integrated in your academic community. A lifetime appointment is pretty miserable, however, if you’re widely reviled and socially isolated within your institution or field.”— The civilisational disaster of Anglo-American academe

“The growth of science denialism in the 21st century can be seen in the mainstream media’s gleeful reaction to the death at 97 of James D. Watson (1928–2025), co-discoverer of the structure of DNA.”— Elementary Watson

“which notoriously argued that I.Q. differences between racial groups are genetic.”— Elementary Watson

“Then in the 15th paragraph, the Post switches gears from scandal-mongering to honest reporting that the science isn’t actually that controversial (the New York Times does this more often than the Post: the marketing department insists on using the opening paragraphs to uphold paying subscribers’ prejudices, while reporters are allowed to report interesting facts toward the bottom of the article after most readers have moved on)”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“As is customary in America when a white male authority figure utters a "gaffe" (memorably defined by Michael Kinsley as when a politician tells the truth), Summers immediately pledged to boost Harvard's hiring of women”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“I have read hundreds and hundreds of articles over the years in local newspapers revealing the shocking news that the local school district has a white-black test score gap! I’ve never once seen any local reporter or official respond: Yeah, well, so does every other single school district in the country.”— Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?

“It’s just indecent of me to admit that I’m not unaware of the most exhaustively documented finding in all of American social science.”— Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?

“Meanwhile, over at BlueSky: Will Stancil is accusing NBA fan Matthew Yglesias of being a Richard Hanania-style scientific racist.”— Stancil: Yglesias is a scientific racist!

“Together, these assumptions—social constructionism, the moral privileging of social change, and identity-based epistemology—shape the research agendas and intellectual boundaries of the discipline.”— Sociology's Pervasively Dubious Assumptions

“This represents a sharp departure from classical sociology, where figures such as Durkheim treated social order as a fragile achievement requiring explanation rather than a pathology requiring dismantling.”— Sociology's Pervasively Dubious Assumptions

“Social alchemy theory—the utterly false notion that if we strip away what is constraining-so-oppressive, true social harmony will emerge—comes from Critical Theory. Nevertheless, its pious hopes of harmony-through-stripping-away-the-blocks-to-our-underlying-sameness is a delusion to which blank slate liberal universalism offers weak resistance, and into which it can easily slide.”— Where do we go from here?

“Shared delusions can be very powerful. Making shared false claims can aid social coordination. Being willing to engage in any level of rationalisation and not-noticing to affirm a shared false belief signals your commitment to motivating common claims as well as your soundness as a member of a moral in-group.”— Where do we go from here?

“The view that race is a pernicious myth, that most ethnic inequalities are caused by racism, and that the way to combat racial injustice is to heighten racial consciousness is so widespread that it is now the orthodox position, and views which contradict it are often either objurgated or suppressed.”— The case for race realism

“These dissenters were eventually so successful that their view, once an outlier, is now the mainstream view.”— The case for race realism

“Wokism didn’t win because it was backed by power. It was backed by power because it became the ideology of the elites who wield power. Ideas first, tanks second.”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“If you present wokesters with information about race and IQ, they will put their fingers in their ears and call you “racist.””— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“Madison Grant (a leading American anti-immigration activist and Nordic supremacist) attributed the “widespread and fatuous belief in the power of environment” to “the dogma of the brotherhood of man, derived in turn from the loose thinkers of the French Revolution and their American mimics.””— Was I Wrong about Woke?

“Q. Does race exist scientifically? A. In the modern scientific community, the consensus is that race does not exist as a biological or genetic category among humans. Instead, scientists recognize race as a social construct—a classification system created by humans to group people based on perceived physical, social, and cultural differences.”— Does Race Exist?

“Wikipedia has been taken over by a clique of leftist nuts: Scientific racism...”— Should Human Biodiversity Be as Respectable as Giraffe Biodiversity?

“Scholars interested in race and ethnicity concur that human races are social constructs, and that there are no meaningful genetic differences between socially defined races. However, this belief is not held by the general public. Despite decades of public education, surveys show that people still regard race as a biological concept,”— Lala Land

“he got more worried about being cancelled and became a strident promulagator of the Race Does Not Exist coventional wisdom.”— Lala Land

“From the New York Times’ review: ... Jason Roberts tells the story of the scholars who tried to taxonomize the world.”— No Vibe Shift Visible in the Pulitzer Prizes

“Over the past year, debate about ancestry estimation has exploded in U.S. forensic anthropology, with a flurry of papers examining its accuracy, interrogating its methods, and questioning its assumptions.”— Latest Rationalization: Race Doesn't Exist, But Subraces Do

“This program will unravel the intersections of race, culture, and identity as reflected in the power of hair to shape our perceptions of style, beauty, and resistance.”— World War Hair at the Smithsonian

“This led to tut-tutting that everybody who has been to college now knows that race does not exist biologically.”— World War Hair at the Smithsonian

“In interviews, several scholars questioned why the executive order appeared to take issue with that view, which is now broadly held.”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

“a widely held position in the scientific community.”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

“Until the genome age began early in this century, it had been assumed that there were no survivors of Caribbean Amerindians like the Taino and Carib.”— Can You Identify the Races of America?

Resulting Policies

Civil rights laws of the 1960s, affirmative action, Head Start, No Child Left Behind, and welfare aimed for equal outcomes via environment. ^[1] Post-2020, DEI spread to boardrooms, universities, and bureaucracies. ^[1] Affirmative action and hypersensitivity followed failed equality. ^[3] Civil rights laws, reinterpreted, mandated wokism via critical theory. ^[5] Hanania noted they made woke mandatory, but they stemmed from the thesis. ^[6] NIH restricted ABCD data post-racial studies. ^[8] Policies for Africa ignored IQ results. ^[10] Harvard backlash forced Summers' resignation. ^[11] Elite admissions compensated gaps since 1960s. ^[12] Anti-discrimination laws created commissars. ^[15] DEI in ESG imposed equity. ^[15] Racially conscious policies confronted injustice. ^[16] DEI mandates treated disparities as environmental. ^[17] Laws were weaponized for equity. ^[17] 1964-1965 legislation expected parity, leading to affirmative action. ^[18] Post-1960s affirmative action forced equality. ^[18] Endangered Species Act committed spending for biodiversity. ^[20] Forensic standards replaced racial categories. ^[23] Trump's order targeted Smithsonian ideology. ^[24][25]

▶ Supporting Quotes (20)

“Believers in racial sameness originally thought that the civil rights legislation of the 1960s would lead to equality. When that didn’t work, they tried affirmative action, welfare, welfare reform, Head Start, No Child Left Behind, and countless other programs”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“Millennials, zoomers, and elites remain firmly on the side of DEI and cancel culture. ... wokesters are on a path to achieve absolute power”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“We started with affirmative action and hypersensitivity to underperforming minorities. Since that didn’t work, we eventually resorted to tearing down statues and canceling people for microaggressions.”— Victory without a Hereditarian Revolution?

“The original civil rights laws unambiguously prohibited discrimination against whites and men. But when it became clear that legal equality would not lead to equality of outcome, lawyers and bureaucrats decided that the law says that everyone has to be woke, and they looked to philosophies like critical race theory to justify their decisions.”— A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution

“Hanania points the finger at civil rights law, which in his view made it illegal not to be woke.”— Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem

“Members of the research group were ineligible to obtain data from the ABCD project. But one of them gained access through an American professor who was already being investigated by the N.I.H. over his handling of another child brain study.”— NYT Science Denialism

““all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours—whereas all the testing says not really.””— Elementary Watson

“The fallout in part led him to resign as president of Harvard University.”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“The most realistic argument in favor of racial preferences for African-Americans is that under colorblind meritocracy standards of admission and hiring, elite institutions would feature four-fifths or nine-tenths fewer African-Americans than they do now.”— Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?

“Anti-discrimination/civil rights legislation creates networks of would-be harmonisers—in effect, workplace commissars, or perhaps inquisitors—paid and empowered to treat their fellow citizens as hovering on the edge of wrong-think (racism, etc.) and wrong-act (discrimination).”— Where do we go from here?

“DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion)—often as part of ESG (Environmental and Social Governance)—has added training that regularly operates as little more than struggle sessions while producing a moralised “marginalisation” caste system—female over male, coloured over white, gay over straight, trans over cis, disabled over […]—which is corrosive of organisational harmony and function.”— Where do we go from here?

“Paradoxically, many of these same intellectuals argue that racially conscious policies and analysis are the only way to confront pervasive racial injustice. Race may be illusory, but it has bewitched so many people that breaking its spell requires promoting more racial awareness.”— The case for race realism

“Cognitive elites remain overwhelmingly on the side of DEI.”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“Civil rights law has been a powerful weapon in the hands of wokesters, and we need to snatch it away from them.”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“Legal equality was achieved in the United States with the civil rights legislation of 1964 and 1965.”— Was I Wrong about Woke?

“they instituted policies like affirmative action to achieve a degree of equality of outcome that would be impossible under a colorblind system.”— Was I Wrong about Woke?

“Here in the United States, we’ve spent and/or foregone huge amounts of money to preserve biodiversity since the 1973 Endangered Species Act.”— Should Human Biodiversity Be as Respectable as Giraffe Biodiversity?

“A committee of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences’s standards board is now hammering out a new standard that would, if adopted, direct professionals away from racial categories and toward more specific social and biological populations”— Latest Rationalization: Race Doesn't Exist, But Subraces Do

“the Trump White House has released an executive order entitled “RESTORING TRUTH AND SANITY TO AMERICAN HISTORY” featuring complaints about shows put on at the Smithsonian Institution”— World War Hair at the Smithsonian

“When President Trump issued an executive order claiming that the Smithsonian Institution had “come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology,” he singled out a sculpture exhibition at the Smithsonian American Art Museum in Washington.”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

Harm Caused

In 2020, a Mexican American worker lost his job over a misconstrued gesture. ^[1] Purges ousted academics like Carl, Winegard, and Hsu, with Wax harassed. ^[1] Cancel culture peaked, blocking nonconformists. ^[1] Sowell's theory misleads scientifically and politically. ^[2] It risks alienation without resolution. ^[2] The thesis fuels war on racism, curtailing freedoms. ^[3] Zoomers' DEI commitment risks woke regimes. ^[3] Wax fought career damage since 2017. ^[4] It sustains regenerating DEI cycles. ^[5] Meritocracy without addressing innates would spark counterassaults. ^[5] It widens liberal-conservative IQ gaps, underrepresenting conservatives. ^[6] The right builds no competitors, squandering potential. ^[6] Adherence repels elites, risking backwater states. ^[6] Cancelled studies delayed disease treatments. ^[7] Suppression hinders bioengineering and fuels resentment. ^[7] Pesta's firing exemplified crackdowns. ^[8] Inquiry faced restrictions despite funding. ^[8] Billions wasted on false claims eroded trust. ^[9] Policies risked catastrophe by ignoring evidence. ^[9] Mandates produced dysfunction and backlash. ^[10] Summers' resignation chilled discussions. ^[11] Scandals risk politicizing data. ^[11] Abolishing preferences would harm black classes. ^[12] Reforms wasted billions without progress. ^[12] Sociology's imbalance limits diversity. ^[14] DEI affected employment, collapsing Hollywood quality. ^[15] Anti-police activism surged crimes. ^[15] Welfare enabled fraud. ^[15] Narratives undermine trust and promote animosity. ^[16] Disparities render pushback ineffective. ^[16] It fuels futile crusades and dysfunction. ^[17] Anti-woke lacks capital. ^[17] Victories prove illusory. ^[17] Gaps led to escalating war on racism. ^[18] Awokening spiked cancellations. ^[18] Crusades erode institutions. ^[18] Interventions fail to close gaps. ^[21] Medical proxies are undermined. ^[21] Abandoning estimation delays identifications. ^[23] Shift eroded Smithsonian reputation. ^[24] Suppression obscured sculptures. ^[25] Overreliance risks improper prescriptions. ^[26]

▶ Supporting Quotes (42)

“a Mexican American utility worker was fired because he was pictured cracking his knuckles in such a way that it looked vaguely like he was making an OK hand sign, and the OK hand sign looks like a W attached to an upside down P, which are the first letters of the words “White” and “Power.””— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“There were mass purges of anyone thought to be an obstacle to “social justice.” ... Noah Carl and Bo Winegard can’t be fired a second time. Stephen Hsu can’t be forced to resign ... (as in the case of Amy Wax), they are subject to endless harassment and punishment.”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“we still have a historically high level of cancel c ... There are many filters to ensure that ideological nonconformists won’t make it past graduate school, let alone to the level of tenured professor. Similar mechanisms are in place at leading corporations, government bureaucracies”— Wokism Is Just Beginning

“Blaming “culture” for racial disparities is scientifically wrong and politically unhelpful.”— Thomas Sowell’s Wishful Thinking about Race

“Apparently, many conservatives who think it’s too offensive to say there’s a natural 15-point IQ gap between blacks and whites believe it is fine to tell blacks that they are lazy, violent, promiscuous, improvident, drunk, and reckless, but for cultural reasons.”— Thomas Sowell’s Wishful Thinking about Race

“Society will be in a permanent state of war against racism and sexism. In wartime, you can’t expect free speech, academic freedom, or due process.”— Victory without a Hereditarian Revolution?

“Kaufmann provides very discouraging data regarding the extent to which the young generation has drunk the DEI Kool-Aid. Politically, zoomers are far worse than even millennials. If current trends continue, in a few years they will start taking over our institutions, and they will vote for politicians to implement a woke fascist regime.”— Victory without a Hereditarian Revolution?

“She has been fighting for her job ever since.”— Race, Wokism, and Academia with Amy Wax

“Until we defeat the taboo on hereditarianism, our victories will always be temporary. Every time we cut off a tentacle of the DEI monster, it will grow back. Harvard President Claudine Gay will be replaced by someone worse. We’ll ban “diversity statements” for university job applications, but zero Republicans will be hired.”— A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution

“Under a colorblind system that judged applicants only by academic qualifications, blacks would make up 0.7% of Harvard students... In a meritocracy, Harvard faculty would be recruited from the best of the best students, which means the number of black professors would approach 0%.”— A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution

““Extreme liberals” score the highest at 107, followed by “liberals” at 105. They were trailed by “conservatives” at 101, and “extreme conservatives” at 98.5.”— Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem

“If conservatives are just as smart and intellectual as liberals, why have they failed to create even a single major conservative-friendly university that is remotely competitive with the top liberal universities?”— Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem

“The Conservative States of America would most likely be a middle-income country that squanders its national budget on hunting down abortion doctors and erecting Pyramid of Giza-scale Ten Commandments monuments.”— Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problem

“I don’t recall hearing that any such study has been completed in the two decades since. Cochran is aware of three proposed studies that got pretty far along before being cancelled... With luck, it could lead to better treatments of victims of these diseases.”— I Made the Epstein Files!

“allowing the honest study of the social impact of existing genetic differences would help us make better informed decisions about whether we want to permit bioengineers to create new genetic disparities in the lab. The savage persecutions suffered by Jews suggest that high intelligence can generate resentment among the masses.”— I Made the Epstein Files!

“Because the taxpayers are shelling out for the ABCD, it was intended to be operated on the “open science” model with the data broadly available. But that freedom is being squeezed because some scientists have lately used these huge new longitudinal databases to look into key questions of the age and found politically unwelcome answers.”— NYT Science Denialism

“Billions of dollars are spent—in academe and in schools—teaching claims about the world that are demonstrably false... You systematically inject false claims about the world—especially on such a massive scale—into public discourse and you create a deeply dysfunctional public discourse.”— The civilisational disaster of Anglo-American academe

“Injecting false claims into those being educated to form and carry out foreign, military and diplomatic policy is serious. It is potentially catastrophic... When the first documents came out, it was pretty clear that they [the Soviet leadership] really did believe their own ideology. And yet the theorists of International Relations in the West had said the ideology is irrelevant. … And so I can remember going to my Political Science friends and saying, your Theory is not right. We have archival evidence showing that they really did believe the ideology. And my political science friends said, “oh, we don’t want to hear about it. We have to save the Theory. Forget about the archives.””— The civilisational disaster of Anglo-American academe

“Over the past dozen years, we’ve seen countless examples of all the things that go wrong with public policy when the only allowable opinion is that the problems of blacks are due to white badness. (Realistic liberals might include Trump’s 2024 reelection in that list.)”— Elementary Watson

“That was a real turning point in the history of the 21st Century... We now know that the Larry Summers whoop-tee-doo was the opening salvo of the Great Awokening”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

““A statistician cited statistics when asked — that’s not a story or controversial. As BLS commissioner, Dr. Antoni will rely on objective data to restore integrity, accountability and America’s trust in the agency,””— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“The African-American upper middle class would be ravaged by the abolition of affirmative action and the middle class would take a bruising.”— Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?

“But, eventually, it became obvious that blacks were not going to make a great leap forward. So then we entered the Great Awokening when elites devoted their energies to blood libeling whites for the failure of blacks to close The Gap.”— Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?

“However, this political imbalance is better understood as the outcome of a deeper and more consequential problem. ... Rather than studying how biological constraints or universal human tendencies shape social organization, sociology focuses on demonstrating how categories are constructed. Rather than examining how social stability supports economic coordination, mental health, and social trust, the dominant orientation is to treat existing order as presumptively oppressive and in need of transformation.”— Sociology's Pervasively Dubious Assumptions

“As straight white males are at the bottom of this moralised “marginalisation” caste system, the DEI mentality and commissariat has adversely affected the employment of young males of European descent (“white”), especially in entertainment, publishing and academe. The collapse in the quality of Hollywood’s offerings and box-office returns as a result has been notable—the US has thrown away a considerable amount of its “soft power”.”— Where do we go from here?

“The post Ferguson (2014) and George Floyd (2020) anti-police activism led to massive surges in assaults and homicides as police pulled back and so interrupted patterns of reactive aggression much less in the localities where that aspect of law enforcement was most needed.”— Where do we go from here?

“We use Minnesota’s welfare-fraud revelations as a particularly florid example of policy decay.”— Where do we go from here?

“not taking it seriously is potentially calamitous because it allows implausible and pernicious narratives about pervasive racism to flourish. For without reasonable competitors, such narratives proliferate like bacteria in an unclean wound, destroying the body politic by undermining trust in important institutions and promoting animosity against whites and other successful races.”— The case for race realism

“their efforts are severely limited by their inability or unwillingness to discuss the recalcitrant underlying race differences in measured cognitive ability and violent crime that make large outcome disparities inevitable.”— The case for race realism

“Wokism inevitably spirals into a desperate, futile crusade against the environmental forces (white racism or sexism) blamed for unequal outcomes.”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“The right simply does not have the human capital to retake the institutions and run them effectively. The vast majority of intelligent, psychologically stable, and public-spirited Americans remain left and woke.”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“But the idea that we have achieved victory over wokism is an illusion.”— Beating Woke with Facts and Logic

“Since activists were unwilling to question the equality thesis, they invented a body of theory (e.g., critical theory, critical race theory) to explain the failure of civil rights laws”— Was I Wrong about Woke?

“The Great Awokening occurred when we reached a tipping point around 2012.”— Was I Wrong about Woke?

“This leads to an ever-escalating war on racism (and sexism), which, in cases where disparities are due to genetic differences, will never end.”— Was I Wrong about Woke?

“How much has vast social spending succeeded in reducing the white-black IQ gap over the last 56 years?”— Lala Land

“ancestry analyses, confirm that there are genetic differences between populations, while the medical community uses race as a disease-risk criterion, and links differences between populations to the incidence of medical conditions (e.g., stroke, heart disease).”— Lala Land

““Many of the unknown individuals that come to us are from disenfranchised populations,” adds Williams, who is Black. “When you take off the table a parameter that could help somebody get home to their family … then it’s not the greater good.””— Latest Rationalization: Race Doesn't Exist, But Subraces Do

“This shift has promoted narratives that portray American and Western values as inherently harmful and oppressive.”— World War Hair at the Smithsonian

“Hoffman's collection was broken up. A quarter of it is now in Cedar Rapids. When I last visited the Field Museum in 1999, only about half the statues were on display, and many of those were pushed into dark corners, often without labels.”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

“so scientists could warn doctors in the future, say, “Don’t prescribe medication X to race Y.””— Can You Identify the Races of America?

Downfall

Eighteen years after Watson's 2007 comments, no tests disproved racial intelligence gaps, prompting growing questions about the equal intelligence assumption. ^[10] Media reaction stemmed from implication implausibility, yet persistent data challenges denial. ^[10] A 2003 Scottish study showed boys at cognitive extremes, contradicting equal distributions. ^[11] A 2016 international test confirmed male variability. ^[11] Low female Nobel shares since 2000 underscore tail differences. ^[11] Supreme Court discoveries exposed gaps; Trump's push highlights quota issues. ^[12] A 2020 survey found 41 percent awareness, undermining ignorance. ^[12] Critics note extremism in denying biology and point to pre-1492 boundaries. ^[19] A 2024 giraffe DNA study revealed branches with low mixing, leading to four species. ^[20] Cavalli-Sforza's maps exposed clusters matching races. ^[21] Lactase persistence varies by group. ^[21] DNA tests distinguish races, contradicting superficial claims. ^[22] Jefferson refuted Buffon with animal data. ^[22] Skull techniques predict ancestry, fueling subrace rationales. ^[23] Trump's order highlighted exhibit hypocrisy. ^[24] 21st-century scans locate origins accurately. ^[25] Observable differences in sports contradict non-biological views. ^[25] All Of Us data revealed population structure with clusters. ^[26] Seven ancestry clusters emerged from DNA, matching US groups. ^[26]

▶ Supporting Quotes (19)

“Since James D. Watson was publicly humiliated, 18 years have passed. Have any new test results disproved Watson’s observation?”— Elementary Watson

“The main reason that the media treated Watson so shamefully, of course, was not because there was something factually or logically wrong about his observation, but because the implication that the great man of science drew from these facts is so obviously plausible.”— Elementary Watson

“A 2003 study based on the aptitude test scores of Scottish 11-year-olds from 1932 found that “boys were over-represented at the low and high extremes of cognitive ability.””— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“A 2016 study that measured students’ scores on standardized tests published in Large-scale Assessments in Education, a publication from the International Educational Research Institute, declared, “The ‘greater male variability hypothesis’ is confirmed,””— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“I’d add that in the 2000s, women have made up 15 of the 193 Nobel laureates in the hard sciences (physics, chemistry, and medicine), or 7.8%.”— Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometrics

“People who followed the discovery process in SFAA vs. Harvard know that.”— Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?

“in weighted results from a national nonprobability survey, only about 41% of US adults indicated awareness of this IQ gap.”— Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?

“The extremism of pronouncing “no biological basis” is striking. ... The Atlantic Ocean is not a sharp boundary that divided one human race from another up through 1492?”— Does Race Exist?

“A 2024 study of DNA, for example, revealed that living giraffes belong to four main branches that do not interbreed much since diverging from a common ancestor about 280,000 years ago. Another 2024 study, of 515 giraffe skulls, revealed anatomical differences between the four groups.”— Should Human Biodiversity Be as Respectable as Giraffe Biodiversity?

“Basically, all his number-crunching has produced a map that looks about like what you'd get if you gave Strom Thurmond a paper napkin and a box of crayons and had him draw a racial map of the world.”— Lala Land

“The best-studied GCC example is the coevolution of milk use with alleles that allow adult humans to digest lactose.”— Lala Land

“That’s why 21st Century DNA tests aren’t able to distinguish people of different races. Oh, wait …”— No Vibe Shift Visible in the Pulitzer Prizes

“Jefferson refuted Buffon's claims, citing for example the American (black) bear at 412 pounds and the European bear at 153, the American beaver at 45 pounds and the European at 18.”— No Vibe Shift Visible in the Pulitzer Prizes

“By statistically comparing the measurements with those from skulls with known identities, she could predict the continental ancestry—and the commonly used racial categories that may correspond to it—that a person likely identified as when alive.”— Latest Rationalization: Race Doesn't Exist, But Subraces Do

“Now, if you have four grandparents from one place, such as Provence, commercial race science firms like Ancestry.com and 23andMe can usually nail their average location down to within a hundred miles or so”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

“As everybody can tell while watching sports on TV: Manute Bol was a 7’6” tribesman from the Dinka people of South Sudan, a famously elongated group of Nilotics”— NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"

“The application of several different cluster analysis methods to participants’ genomic PCA data revealed evidence for substantial population structure in the cohort, with dense clusters of relatively closely related participants interspersed among less dense regions in PC space.”— Can You Identify the Races of America?

“Here are seven racial groups that emerge from the genetic data (not from self-identification), plus a miscellaneous cluster.”— Can You Identify the Races of America?

Sources

[1]
Wokism Is Just Beginningopinion
Nathan Cofnas · Nathan Cofnas’s Newsletter · 2024-10-29
[2]
Thomas Sowell’s Wishful Thinking about Racereputable_journalism
Nathan Cofnas · Nathan Cofnas’s Newsletter · 2024-08-12
[3]
Victory without a Hereditarian Revolution?opinion
Nathan Cofnas · Nathan Cofnas’s Newsletter · 2024-07-31
[4]
Race, Wokism, and Academia with Amy Waxopinion
Nathan Cofnas and Amy Wax · Nathan Cofnas’s Newsletter · 2024-03-25
[5]
A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolutionopinion
Nathan Cofnas · Nathan Cofnas’s Newsletter · 2024-02-05
[6]
Why We Need to Talk about the Right’s Stupidity Problemopinion
Nathan Cofnas · Nathan Cofnas’s Newsletter · 2024-01-02
[7]
I Made the Epstein Files!opinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer Substack · 2026-02-01
[8]
NYT Science Denialismopinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer · 2026-01-26
[9]
The civilisational disaster of Anglo-American academeopinion
Lorenzo Warby · Lorenzo from Oz · 2025-11-23
[10]
Elementary Watsonopinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer's Substack · 2025-11-20
[11]
Scandal! A Trump Nominee Is Not Ignorant of Basic Psychometricsopinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer Substack · 2025-09-03
[12]
Has the "Bell Curve" taboo doomed affirmative action?opinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer Substack · 2025-05-02
[13]
Stancil: Yglesias is a scientific racist!opinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer Substack · 2025-04-17
[14]
Sociology's Pervasively Dubious Assumptionsopinion
Joshua Murray · Unsafe Science · 2025-12-22
[15]
Where do we go from here?opinion
Helen Dale and Lorenzo Warby · Not On Your Team, But Always Fair · 2026-01-24
[16]
The case for race realismopinion
Bo Winegard · Aporia Magazine · 2023-12-26
[17]
Beating Woke with Facts and Logicopinion
Nathan Cofnas · Nathan Cofnas’s Newsletter · 2025-10-09
[18]
Was I Wrong about Woke?opinion
Nathan Cofnas · Nathan Cofnas’s Newsletter · 2025-01-29
[19]
Does Race Exist?opinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer · 2025-12-28
[20]
Should Human Biodiversity Be as Respectable as Giraffe Biodiversity?opinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer Substack · 2025-08-24
[21]
Lala Landopinion
Steve Sailer · stevesailer.net · 2025-07-03
[22]
No Vibe Shift Visible in the Pulitzer Prizesopinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer · 2025-05-06
[23]
Latest Rationalization: Race Doesn't Exist, But Subraces Doopinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer · 2025-04-28
[24]
World War Hair at the Smithsonianopinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer's Substack · 2025-04-01
[25]
NYT: "Taking Aim at Smithsonian, Trump Wades Into Race and Biology"opinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer · 2025-04-01
[26]
Can You Identify the Races of America?opinion
Steve Sailer · Steve Sailer · 2025-05-05

ID: FA-20260209-9426efb4 · Created: 2026-02-09T20:24:02.234330 · Schema v3