Great-Because-Girl Stories Succeed Commercially
False Assumption: Injecting 'great-because-girl' tropes and 'bad-because-boy' dynamics into male-centric franchises will maintain or expand audience appeal and box office success.
Written by FARAgent on February 09, 2026
In the 2010s, Disney shelled out billions to acquire male-dominated franchises like Star Wars, the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and Indiana Jones, betting big on their enduring fanbases. But then came the pivot: executives reshaped these properties with female protagonists who effortlessly outshone men—Rey mastering the Force sans training, live-action Mulan as a prodigy warrior with extra qi—while demoting male heroes to deadbeat dads or pathetic hermits. What followed was a cascade of flops, from declining Star Wars sequel box offices to the Mulan remake's thud, all while male-centric holdouts like Top Gun: Maverick raked in $1.5 billion by sticking to their guns.
The consequences unfolded in red ink and alienated fans. Disney's sequel trilogy grossed progressively less—$2.1bn, $1.3bn, $1.1bn—on films costing hundreds of millions each, atop the $4bn Lucasfilm purchase. TV spin-offs veered from hits like early Mandalorian to debacles like The Acolyte, leaving the company pondering how to lure back young males it had spent fortunes repelling. Critics like the Critical Drinker dubbed it a 'post-creativity era,' where signaling trumped storytelling.
Today, mounting questions surround these feminizing strategies, with Disney openly discussing male audience recovery and successes like Chinese C-dramas showing strong female leads without the 'great-because-girl' crutch. Critics argue Hollywood's moralized status games, unmoored from cultural ballast, are tanking engagement; evidence from box office trends suggests the blank-slate feminism fueling it may be more hubris than hit formula, though defenders cling to diversity dogma amid the wreckage.
Status: Growing recognition that this assumption was false, but not yet mainstream
People Involved
- In the mid-2010s, as Hollywood pushed feminized narratives into established franchises, a few voices raised early alarms.
- Critical Drinker, a YouTube critic, pointed out the flaws in films like the live-action Mulan remake, calling it part of a post-creativity era driven by woke signaling. He warned that injecting great-because-girl tropes ignored basic storytelling needs. [1]
- Nerdrotic, another YouTube commentator, dissected how bad-because-boy dynamics were ruining screenwriting in male-centric series. These critics acted as cassandras, highlighting risks that industry insiders dismissed at the time. [1] Growing evidence now suggests their concerns were prescient, though the debate over commercial impacts remains unsettled.
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“what YouTube critic Critical Drinker calls our post-creativity era.”— The culture is not feminising
“As YouTuber Nerdrotic so well expresses it:”— The culture is not feminising
Organizations Involved
Disney spent billions acquiring male-centric franchises like Star Wars and Marvel in the early 2010s, only to reshape them with great-because-girl protagonists and bad-because-boy elements. The company enforced these changes through its vast institutional control, which alienated core male fans.
[1] Broader Hollywood institutions championed feminized storytelling as a sure path to success, prioritizing woke signaling over narrative strength and contributing to franchise declines.
[1] Meanwhile, the publishing industry, dominated by women at 80 percent of its workforce by the 2010s, disrupted the book-to-movie pipeline; men largely stopped reading new books, drying up male-oriented source material.
[1] Increasingly, these organizational shifts are recognized as flawed drivers of the assumption, though not all experts agree on the extent of the damage.
▶ Supporting Quotes (3)
“Disney spent billions buying male-centric franchises—Star Wars, the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Indiana Jones… It then proceeded to so alienate the fan bases of those franchises that it is now reduced to openly discussing how to appeal to male audiences that it spent billions acquiring and further billions alienating.”— The culture is not feminising
“Hollywood’s problems are not some general failure of films and television, they are specific to Western entertainment and Hollywood in particular.”— The culture is not feminising
“Now that the publishing industry is about 80 per cent female, men have largely stopped reading new books, and the book-to-movie pipeline is a lot less healthy than it used to be.”— The culture is not feminising
The Foundation
The assumption rested on the blank slate view of human nature, a feminist ideology that gained traction in academic circles from the late 20th century onward. This perspective held that women could excel at male standards and improve upon them, ignoring innate sex differences and how stories resonate with audiences.
[1] It spawned sub-beliefs in effortless female superiority, which seemed credible at first but misled creators. A study in the 2010s examined Disney's habit of feminizing male characters in animations, bolstering the idea that demographic shifts made male-centric tales obsolete.
[1] Growing evidence suggests this foundation was shaky, with real-world audience reactions exposing its flaws, even as some defenders maintain its validity.
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“This is a cinematic version of a classic failing of feminism—by taking a blank slate view of humans, turning what men do into the standard for women. Women are great because they can do everything men can do, but even better.”— The culture is not feminising
“A recent study found that Disney has tended, over time, to feminise male characters in its animated movies.”— The culture is not feminising
How It Spread
By the 2010s, feminization took hold in Hollywood through institutional dynamics. Women reached a critical mass in key roles, enabling vetoes that steered products toward great-because-girl narratives via status games and moral signaling.
[1] These moralized games elevated correct beliefs above solid storytelling, spreading the assumption across studios. The effect amplified in publishing, where 80 percent female dominance by that decade choked off the male book pipeline, limiting diverse adaptations.
[1] Social pressures and punishment of dissenters helped sustain the idea, though increasingly it's seen as a propagation mechanism that backfired commercially.
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
“This feminisation can come from women literally becoming a majority of an occuption or industry (demographic feminisation), or it can come from women reaching sufficient critical mass as to create an effective veto that pushes an organisation—and its products—in a feminising direction (feminising dynamics).”— The culture is not feminising
“Hollywood’s ability to engage audiences has declined due to moralised status games that are not only without cultural power and resonance, they have deliberately degraded their ability to have such.”— The culture is not feminising
Harm Caused
Disney's Star Wars sequels illustrated the toll starting in 2015. The first film grossed $2.1 billion on a $245 million budget, but returns dropped to $1.3 billion and then $1.1 billion for the next two, despite similar costs, following the $4 billion acquisition.
[1] This pattern alienated fans and cost billions in lost franchise appeal. The 2020 live-action Mulan remake bombed at the box office, far underperforming the 1998 original's success, due to virtue-signaling that overshadowed story quality.
[1] Across Hollywood, the trend of women who can't struggle and men who can't triumph eroded audience engagement, contributing to a broader industry decline.
[1] Growing evidence points to these harms as evidence the assumption was flawed, though the full scope is still debated.
▶ Supporting Quotes (3)
“Each film in the sequel trilogy did worse box office than its predecessor: The Force Awakens ($2.1bn), The Last Jedi ($1.3bn), The Rise of Skywalker ($1.1bn). This was more of a problem than it might appear, as Disney had paid $4bn for Lucasfilm and these were very expensive films to make ($245m, $317m and $275m respectively, plus distribution costs).”— The culture is not feminising
“The 2020 live-action Mulan remake was not a box office success. It was not for many reasons, but it was also emblematic of the problems of what YouTube critic Critical Drinker calls our post-creativity era.”— The culture is not feminising
“The biggest problem with modern screenwriting is that women aren’t allowed to struggle and men aren’t allowed to triumph.”— The culture is not feminising