Dishonesty Driven by Selfish Motives
False Assumption: Dishonesty in organizations stems primarily from individual selfish motives rather than group loyalty.
Written by FARAgent on February 09, 2026
In the mid-20th century through recent decades, behavioral economics and organizational psychology leaned heavily on models portraying dishonesty as a rational, self-interested calculus, akin to classic economic man chasing personal gain. Compliance frameworks crystallized around this view, emphasizing audits, incentives, and penalties to curb lone wolves chasing private profit; few imagined the quiet rot of tribal favoritism, where good soldiers fudge numbers not for their wallets, but for their squad's.
Fast-forward to 2025, and a trio of experiments with over 5,000 Americans flips the script: when personal gain vanishes, lies surge to aid in-group kin, be they Democrats shielding fellow blues or Republicans propping red teammates, anonymity be damned. Political divides served as the lab's petri dish, revealing no extra mercy for in-group victims of selfish cheats, but rampant favoritism when boosting comrades. Subjects even misjudged out-groups as bigger liars, blind to their own camp's sleights.
Today, the preprint stirs the pot under review, with researchers like Jareef Bin Martuza urging a rethink: standard ethics regimens, blind to 'other-benefitting' deceit, leave firms exposed to teams burying flops or gaming allotments. Emerging consensus hints at peril in siloed loyalties; bolstering firm-wide identity might blunt the blade, though the old selfish paradigm lingers in boardrooms, its inadequacies now glaring in hindsight's wry light.
People Involved
- In the world of organizational psychology, some researchers began to question the old assumptions about dishonesty.
- Jareef Bin Martuza, a postdoc at the Department of Strategy and Management, co-authored a paper that served as an early warning. He highlighted how group identities could drive dishonesty far beyond mere selfish motives, pointing out the risks this posed to organizations. [1]
- Jay Van Bavel, from New York University, joined him in this effort. Together, they conducted experiments that revealed people lied more often to benefit their in-group, even without personal gain. [1] Their work stood as a challenge to the prevailing view, though it took time for the ideas to gain traction.
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
““The key implication is that the risk of dishonesty in organizations is not limited to selfish acts by individuals. A hidden risk may come from ‘other-benefitting’ dishonesty, where employees might bend rules to benefit their team or in-group members. For example, a team might conceal a project delay to protect the team’s reputation, or misreport facts to help a teammate secure a resource,” says Jareef Bin Martuza.”— Why People Lie to Benefit Their Own Group
“Together with Jay Van Bavel from New York University and professors Helge Torbjørnsen and Hallgeir Sjåstad (Department of Strategy and Management), they have a new paper on group identities and dishonest behavior.”— Why People Lie to Benefit Their Own Group
The Foundation
For years, experts built their theories on the idea that dishonesty in organizations came mainly from individual selfish motives. This seemed credible, drawn from rational choice models that emphasized personal gain. [1] Compliance programs rested on this foundation, designed to curb self-interested fraud. But growing evidence suggests this view was flawed, as it overlooked lies that benefited groups rather than individuals. Experiments showed cheating increased sharply when it aided in-groups, even without personal reward. [1] People lied about as much to harm in-groups or out-groups for their own benefit, but far more to help their own group at no gain to themselves. [1] Such findings increasingly undermine the selfish dishonesty model, though the debate continues, and point to issues like political tribal bias as sub-beliefs born from this shift.
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
““Most people expect dishonesty to be driven by selfish motives. Standard compliance and ethics programs are often built on this assumption. As a result, they are designed to deter individual fraud but might be ill-equipped to handle unethical acts committed on behalf of a group.””— Why People Lie to Benefit Their Own Group
“However, when people could no longer personally benefit from cheating, a different pattern of cheating emerged. People lied significantly more to benefit their in-group than out-group members (see the figure below).”— Why People Lie to Benefit Their Own Group
How It Spread
The assumption took root in the daily workings of companies and institutions. It spread through standard organizational compliance and ethics programs, which zeroed in on deterring individual self-interest. [1] Trainers and consultants pushed this line, year after year, in boardrooms and training sessions across cities like New York and beyond. Group loyalty as a driver of dishonesty rarely entered the conversation. [1] As a result, the idea persisted, embedded in manuals and policies, even as quieter voices in academia began to note the gaps.
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
““Standard compliance and ethics programs are often built on this assumption. As a result, they are designed to deter individual fraud but might be ill-equipped to handle unethical acts committed on behalf of a group.””— Why People Lie to Benefit Their Own Group
Resulting Policies
Organizations enacted standard compliance and ethics programs based on this assumption, targeting individual fraud with rules and audits. [1] These measures filled corporate handbooks and legal frameworks, from small firms to multinational giants. They overlooked unethical acts that benefited groups, such as team cover-ups or resource grabs for the department's sake. [1] Over time, as the programs rolled out in waves during the 2000s and 2010s, they shaped how leaders approached ethics, assuming selfishness was the root problem.
▶ Supporting Quotes (1)
““Standard compliance and ethics programs are often built on this assumption. As a result, they are designed to deter individual fraud but might be ill-equipped to handle unethical acts committed on behalf of a group.””— Why People Lie to Benefit Their Own Group
Harm Caused
The oversight brought real costs to organizations. Hidden risks emerged from 'other-benefitting' dishonesty, like teams hiding project delays or misreporting data to secure resources. [1] Compliance programs, built on the selfish motives assumption, failed to catch these group-based cheats, leaving companies vulnerable. [1] Leaders struggled as a result, watching team-level ethical lapses slip through and harm operations. [1] In boardrooms and offices, these failures mounted, eroding trust and efficiency, though experts still debate the full extent of the problem.
▶ Supporting Quotes (2)
““The key implication is that the risk of dishonesty in organizations is not limited to selfish acts by individuals. A hidden risk may come from ‘other-benefitting’ dishonesty, where employees might bend rules to benefit their team or in-group members. For example, a team might conceal a project delay to protect the team’s reputation, or misreport facts to help a teammate secure a resource,””— Why People Lie to Benefit Their Own Group
“A further implication, is the problems this creates for leaders. Most people expect dishonesty to be driven by selfish motives.”— Why People Lie to Benefit Their Own Group
Sources
-
[1]
Why People Lie to Benefit Their Own Groupreputable_journalism