Anti-Police Activism Cuts Homicides
Summaries Written by FARAgent (AI) on February 09, 2026 · Pending Verification
After Ferguson in 2014, and even more after George Floyd in 2020, a great many officials, activists, and journalists treated “overpolicing” as the central danger in Black neighborhoods. “Defund the police,” “reimagine public safety,” and “community-led safety” sounded plausible because there was a real grievance underneath them: abusive stops, ugly videos, low trust, and a long history of police treating poor black areas as occupied territory rather than as places to protect. Reasonable people could look at that record and conclude that fewer aggressive encounters, fewer arrests for low-level disorder, and less reliance on armed officers might reduce conflict and save lives. The belief had a moral logic and a political logic, and for a while it became elite common sense.
Then the practical test arrived. In Baltimore after Freddie Gray, in Chicago after the Laquan McDonald uproar, and across many cities after the Floyd riots, police pulled back, departments lost manpower, proactive policing fell, and homicide clearance rates stayed poor or worsened. The people left to live with the result were mostly the residents whom reformers said they were helping. Murders surged, shootings rose, and black communities bore much of the toll. Growing evidence suggests the old assumption missed a hard fact that critics from Martin Luther King Jr. to urbanists studying the “code of the street” had stressed in different ways: when public order is weak and killers expect not to be caught, the vacuum is not filled by harmony.
The debate is not over. Many reformers still argue that the real causes were poverty, guns, COVID disruption, or long-running institutional failures rather than anti-police politics itself. But an influential minority of researchers and analysts now argue that the post-Ferguson and post-2020 retreat from policing was not a humane correction, it was a dangerous overcorrection, especially where violence was already concentrated. The current dispute is less about whether bad policing exists, nobody serious denies that, than about whether cutting police presence in high-crime black neighborhoods was ever likely to make those neighborhoods safer.
- Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. warned in 1957 sermons about the moral failings inside African American communities, denouncing laziness, promiscuity, criminality, drunkenness, slovenliness, ignorance, violence, and poor habits as barriers to progress. As a Baptist preacher and civil rights leader he spoke from pulpits across the South, urging self-examination rather than external blame alone. His words were later memory-holed by contemporary academe, which preferred cleaner narratives of systemic oppression. The selective editing helped sustain the assumption that external forces like policing were the sole drivers of violence. [1]
- Elijah Anderson, an urban anthropologist who studied inner-city life for decades, described how the code of the streets emerges from alienation and lack of faith in police protection. His fieldwork in Philadelphia and other cities showed residents turning to bravado and self-help violence because they did not trust authorities to deliver justice. Anderson's observations provided a kernel of truth about legal cynicism that later activists stretched into the claim that reducing police presence would calm communities. Instead his work illustrated why low clearance rates perpetuate cycles of retaliation. [1]
- Steve Sailer tracked homicide data week by week as an independent journalist and analyst, warning as early as 2015 that the Ferguson Effect was driving murder spikes in cities like Baltimore. He pointed out that rates in Baltimore soon exceeded even the crack-era peaks of the early 1990s, with the racial reckoning producing a nationwide murder spree. Sailer continued publishing on CDC and FBI numbers showing black homicide deaths rising after de-policing and falling only after policing resumed. His persistent data work made him a repeated cassandra whose forecasts aligned with later trends. [3][9]
- Brandon Scott, Democratic mayor of Baltimore, promoted consent decrees, the Mayor’s Office of Neighborhood Safety and Engagement, and a Comprehensive Violence Reduction Framework built on a public-health model rather than traditional policing. He argued that police alone could not solve gun violence and pushed violence interrupters and community investments as superior alternatives. Scott endorsed non-prosecution of low-level offenses and framed reforms as addressing systemic oppression. Homicides in Baltimore remained stubbornly high throughout his tenure. [16]
- Carmen Best, Seattle’s first Black female police chief with 28 years on the force, publicly criticized city council budget cuts as punitive and shocking before resigning hours after the vote. She warned that slashing the department by 100 officers and eliminating specialized units would leave the city unsafe. Best’s departure highlighted the institutional damage from anti-police activism that had spread after George Floyd’s death. Her resignation underscored the human cost of policies built on the assumption. [25][32]
Black Lives Matter emerged in 2014 after the Ferguson shooting and quickly became the institutional vehicle for anti-police activism across the United States. The organization organized protests that turned into riots in dozens of cities, sent 127 million emails, and drove 1.2 million actions while activists participated in 95 percent of the tracked riots following George Floyd’s death. BLM promoted narratives that reduced policing would lower violence in Black communities and pressured city councils to cut budgets and disband specialized units. Its influence peaked in 2020 before declining, after which homicide numbers began to fall in many cities. [2][10]
The New York Times published sympathetic coverage and opinion columns that framed the racial reckoning as necessary and downplayed the homicide costs of de-policing. Its opinion section ran pieces on how BLM protests had reduced police killings without emphasizing the thousands of additional civilian deaths that followed. The paper helped mainstream the assumption by declaring a racial reckoning after George Floyd and by omitting inconvenient data on black-on-black murder spikes. Readers encountered a consistent message that less police presence equaled more safety. [12]
Baltimore Police Department operated under a federal consent decree sparked by the Freddie Gray case and saw ten commissioners come and go since 1989 amid repeated homicide crises. The department faced low clearance rates that fell to 30.5 percent during peak years, with Black victim clearances lagging far behind white ones. It denied standing down after riots yet watched proactive enforcement drop following protests. Turnover and demoralization compounded the effects of the assumption that reform meant reduced presence. [26][29][31]
Seattle City Council approved budget amendments that cut the police department by $3.5 million, eliminated specialized units, reduced top salaries, and later slashed another $10 million while removing 100 officers. The council acted under pressure from BLM protests and the CHOP occupation, framing the cuts as safe reform that would not increase danger. The moves prompted the resignation of Chief Carmen Best and led to detectives being pulled onto emergency calls. Downtown Seattle became so unsafe that city staff required security escorts. [25][32]
The assumption drew its initial strength from visible high-profile police incidents and long-standing patterns of legal cynicism in some urban neighborhoods. Thoughtful observers could see that aggressive policing sometimes damaged community trust, that clearance rates for Black victims were persistently low, and that historical under-policing in segregated areas had left a legacy of self-help justice. Elijah Anderson’s ethnographic work showed how the code of the streets arises when residents do not believe police will protect them, creating incentives for bravado and preemptive violence. A reasonable person in 2014 could conclude that dialing back confrontational policing might reduce tension without causing a crime wave, especially when pre-Ferguson homicide numbers had been relatively stable. The kernel of truth lay in the real mistrust and in the fact that not every arrest improves long-term safety. [1][6]
High-profile deaths like those of Michael Brown and Freddie Gray seemed to confirm that police presence itself provoked violence. Activists and some academics argued that reducing fear of police would allow communities to breathe and that stereotypes of violence were merely racist constructs rather than reflections of real equilibria. Pre-BLM data showing whites with the highest per capita traffic deaths among major groups lent surface plausibility to claims that traffic enforcement was racially motivated rather than a response to actual driving behavior. These observations made the case for de-policing appear data-driven and morally urgent to many informed people at the time. [4][5]
Subsequent evidence shifted the picture. CDC and FBI statistics documented homicide increases beginning the week of George Floyd’s death, with national murders rising 30 percent in 2020 and Black victims comprising the majority of the additional deaths. Black traffic fatalities rose 36 percent in the second half of 2020 compared with 9 percent for others, and young Black male traffic death rates increased substantially during the period of reduced enforcement. Multivariate analyses found that counties with higher GOP vote shares experienced lower homicide growth, suggesting that local political cultures supporting policing limited the damage. Growing evidence suggests the assumption was flawed. [7][10][12]
Studies that once seemed to support the assumption came under scrutiny. Travis Campbell’s paper claimed Black Lives Matter protests had saved roughly 200 lives from police killings between 2014 and 2019 yet documented over 3,000 additional civilian homicides; he cautioned against direct comparison but the net human cost was hard to ignore. Tyler J. Lane found a 26.1 percent homicide increase in major cities after Ferguson protests linked to eroded trust. The CDC weekly homicide database showed a structural break exactly when protests peaked, not when the pandemic began or when mobility recovered. An influential minority of analysts now argue that the data reveal the opposite of what was promised. [11][12]
The assumption spread rapidly through Black Lives Matter protests and riots that began after Ferguson in 2014 and intensified after George Floyd’s death in 2020. Demonstrations in more than 200 cities turned into sustained pressure on police departments to pull back from proactive enforcement, especially traffic stops involving Black drivers. Media outlets declared a racial reckoning and framed reduced policing as the path to justice, amplifying the message that police fear was the primary problem. Social pressure within academia and elite institutions made open dissent risky, with race realists hiding their views to avoid professional consequences. [1][7][10]
Mainstream media played a central role by promoting pandemic and economic explanations while downplaying the Ferguson Effect. The New York Times and other outlets ran stories that omitted Black Lives Matter’s role in the homicide spike or treated it as secondary to COVID-19 stresses. Academic papers claiming modest reductions in police killings were cited favorably, even when the same studies showed thousands of extra civilian deaths. Public discourse treated partial videos of police encounters as definitive proof of systemic brutality, building outrage that translated into policy demands. [12][30]
Institutional channels reinforced the message. City councils in Minneapolis, Seattle, and Baltimore responded to protest pressure by cutting budgets, disbanding units, and issuing consent decrees that prioritized reform over street-level order. School districts removed school resource officers after George Floyd protests, assuming their presence criminalized students more than it prevented violence. Government messaging on prison reduction and non-prosecution of low-level offenses portrayed these steps as progressive advances in safety. The cumulative effect was a broad cultural shift that equated more policing with more harm. [22][25][27]
After the Ferguson unrest in 2014 and again after George Floyd’s death in 2020, anti-police activism pressured departments in cities including Baltimore, Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Louis to reduce proactive enforcement and traffic stops in Black neighborhoods. The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act advanced through the House with support from figures like Rep. Henry Cuellar, establishing national standards, a misconduct registry, body camera requirements, and community policing grants justified by the need to rebuild trust. Baltimore enacted a federal consent decree, repealed its law enforcement bill of rights, and launched a public-health violence reduction framework that emphasized interrupters over traditional policing. These measures rested on the belief that police presence caused more harm than the violence it interrupted. [1][21][16]
Seattle City Council cut the police budget by millions, eliminated specialized units, and removed 100 officers while the Minneapolis City Council majority openly discussed dismantling the department. Non-prosecution policies for low-level offenses such as drug possession and prostitution were implemented in Baltimore and elsewhere, with plans to divert 911 calls to mental health professionals. Prison and jail populations dropped sharply in 2020 as rogue prosecutors declined cases and cities embraced reintegration programs. School districts in places like Alexandria, Virginia removed school resource officers, assuming their presence exacerbated racial disparities without improving safety. [25][27][22]
Jim Crow-era policies in the South had already institutionalized under-policing in segregated Black communities, lacking both capacity and trust to suppress honor-based violence. Contemporary versions of this pattern appeared in consent decrees and budget cuts that treated aggressive order maintenance as the problem rather than the solution. Clearance rates fell as witness cooperation declined amid mistrust, leaving nearly half of murders unsolved by 2021. The policies were enacted with the explicit claim that reducing police presence would lower violence in Black communities. Growing evidence suggests they achieved the opposite. [6][19]
Homicides surged after both the Ferguson and George Floyd periods, adding an estimated 5,000 extra murders in 2020 alone with African Americans comprising 53 percent of all victims and the majority of the additional deaths. The CDC tracked weekly increases beginning the week of George Floyd’s death, with national homicides rising 41.9 percent from 2014 to 2023 while the population grew only 5 percent. Black homicide victimization rates climbed from 19.5 per 100,000 in 2012-2013 to 22.7 in 2014-2019, producing thousands of excess deaths that might have been avoided under different policy choices. Baltimore’s per-capita murder rate reached 55 per 100,000 in 2015, worse than the crack era, and the city recorded more than 1,500 killings over five years with more than half remaining unsolved. [9][10][12][29]
Traffic fatalities among Black Americans rose dramatically during the period of reduced policing, with the Black rate increasing 45 percent from 2014 to 2024 and 36 percent in the second half of 2020 alone compared with 9 percent for others. Young Black male traffic death rates and suicide rates both climbed significantly over the decade. Overall traffic deaths rose 15 percent nationally since 2014, with the largest increases among the groups with the highest preexisting homicide rates. These deaths compounded the homicide toll and illustrated the broad public safety costs of de-policing. [5][7]
Clearance rates collapsed from over 80 percent in 1965 to 54 percent nationally by 2021, leaving families without justice and emboldening perpetrators who believed they could act with impunity. In Baltimore the rate fell to 30.5 percent in one peak year and showed persistent racial disparities, with Black victim clearances lagging white ones by wide margins. Low solve rates perpetuated bravado culture, feuds, and reactive aggression in under-policed neighborhoods. The human cost included record ambushes on officers, demoralization, and public trust in policing falling to 20 percent. [19][31]
The assumption began to lose force when homicide numbers spiked exactly when and where protests and de-policing were most intense. CDC weekly data revealed a structural break in the last week of May 2020 coinciding with George Floyd protests rather than pandemic onset or mobility changes. Cities with higher Republican vote shares experienced smaller increases, suggesting that local support for policing limited the damage. International comparisons showed homicides falling in comparable nations, undermining universal explanations like COVID stress. Growing evidence suggests the link between reduced police presence and rising violence was real. [10][11][12]
As Black Lives Matter influence waned after 2020, policing resumed in many jurisdictions and homicide rates began to fall. CDC WONDER data showed weekly homicide deaths declining through mid-2025, with some cities recording sharp drops or even weeks with zero murders by 2025. Black traffic death rates peaked in 2021 and then drifted downward, though they remained elevated compared with pre-2014 baselines. The end of the murder spree tracked by the CDC exposed the assumption’s failure in plain numbers. [2][4][5]
High-profile studies and official statistics further undermined the original claims. The Washington Post database and FBI figures revealed that the number of unarmed Black shootings by police was far smaller than activist rhetoric suggested, with liberal estimates off by a factor of ten. Multivariate models controlling for demographics confirmed that the 2020 political indicator predicted higher homicide growth better than economic factors alone. A substantial body of experts now reject the idea that reducing police presence lowers violence in Black communities, though the broader debate over policing reform remains unsettled. [8][11]
-
[1]
Bravado in the absence of order (3)reputable_journalism
-
[2]
Homicides Way Downopinion
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
-
[7]
Steve Sailer: Still noticing after all these yearsreputable_journalism
-
[8]
Race & Policing: A Data-Driven Look at Policing and Its Discontentsreputable_journalism
- [9]
-
[10]
What the Media Doesn’t Want You To Know About 2020’s Record Murder Spikereputable_journalism
-
[11]
Breaking Down the 2020 Homicide Spikereputable_journalism
- [12]
- [16]
-
[17]
This 3-Year-Old's Murder Is Part Of South Africa's Alarming 'Epidemic'reputable_journalism
- [18]
-
[19]
Why experts say nearly half of US murder cases continue to go unsolvedreputable_journalism
- [20]
- [21]
-
[22]
Violence in Schools Seems to Be Increasing. Why?reputable_journalism
- [23]
-
[24]
Police solve just 2% of all major crimesreputable_journalism
- [25]
-
[26]
Baltimore’s police commissioners through the yearsreputable_journalism
-
[27]
Minneapolis officers quit in wake of George Floyd protestsreputable_journalism
-
[28]
Chicago violence, homicides and shootings up in 2015reputable_journalism
-
[29]
The Numbers Behind Baltimore's Record Year in Homicidesreputable_journalism
-
[30]
Explaining the Great 2020 Homicide Spikereputable_journalism
- [31]
-
[32]
Downtown Seattle so dangerous city staff will have security escortsreputable_journalism
- [33]
-
[34]
More COPS, Less Crimepeer_reviewed
-
[35]
What Communities of Color Want from Police Reformreputable_journalism
- [36]
- Policing Disparities Prove DiscriminationBLM Civil Rights Criminal Justice Culture Wars DEI Education Media Bias Policing Politics Public Health Public Policy Public Safety Race & Ethnicity
- Airport Profiling is Racial DiscriminationCivil Rights Criminal Justice Culture Wars DEI Education Media Bias Politics Public Health Public Policy Public Safety Race & Ethnicity
- Diversity is Our StrengthAfrica Civil Rights Criminal Justice Culture Wars DEI Education Media Bias Politics Public Policy Public Safety Race & Ethnicity
- Affirmative Action Causes No Reverse DiscriminationCivil Rights Criminal Justice Culture Wars DEI Education Media Bias Politics Public Health Public Policy Race & Ethnicity
- Anti-Bias Training WorksCivil Rights Criminal Justice Culture Wars DEI Education Media Bias Politics Public Health Public Policy Race & Ethnicity